Dell Inc. et al v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 25 REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/12/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Michael P. Kenny, Esq. (Georgia Bar No. 415064) mike.kenny@alston.com Debra D. Bernstein, Esq. (Georgia Bar No. 054998) debra.bernstein@alston.com Rodney J. Ganske, Esq. (Georgia Bar No. 283819) rod.ganske@alston.com Andrew J. Tuck, Esq. (Georgia Bar No. 402306) Andy.tuck@alston.com ALSTON & BIRD LLP 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 Tel: (404) 881-7000 Facsimile: (404) 881-7777 12 James M. Wagstaffe, Esq. (State Bar No. 95535) wagstaffe@kerrwagstaffe.com Adrian J. Sawyer, Esq. (State Bar No. 203712) sawyer@kerrwagstaffe.com KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 100 Spear Street, 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-1576 TEL: (415) 371-8500 FAX: (415) 371-0500 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. 9 10 11 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN RE: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates to: DELL INC. and DELL PRODUCTS L.P. Plaintiffs, Case No.: 3:13-cv-03350-RS MDL No. 2143 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS v. HITACHI-LG DATA STORAGE, INC.; HITACHI-LG DATA STORAGE KOREA, INC.; HITACHI, LTD.; PHILIPS & LITE-ON DIGITAL SOLUTIONS CORP.; PHILIPS & LITE-ON DIGITAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.; LITE-ON IT CORP. OF TAIWAN; KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.; BENQ CORPORATION; BENQ AMERICA CORP.; SONY CORPORATION; SONY OPTIARC INC.; NEC CORPORATION; SONY NEC OPTIARC INC.; SONY OPTIARC AMERICA INC.; SONY ELECTRONICS, INC.; TOSHIBA CORPORATION; SAMSUNG JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS Case No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS; MDL No. 2143 1 2 3 4 ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.; TOSHIBA SAMSUNG STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORP.; TOSHIBA SAMSUNG STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORP. KOREA; Defendants. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS Case No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS; MDL No. 2143 1 JOINT STIPULATION 2 It is stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, by their respective attorneys, that: 3 1. Undersigned counsel of ROPES & GRAY agree to accept service of the Complaint in 4 Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:13-cv-03350- 5 RS, on behalf of Defendants Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. and Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea, Inc. 6 (collectively, the “HLDS Defendants”). The HLDS Defendants shall have until Friday, November 7 22, 2013 to file a response thereto. 8 2. Undersigned counsel of BAKER BOTTS LLP agree to accept service of the 9 Complaint in Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc., et al., Case No. 10 3:13-cv-03350-RS, on behalf of Defendants Koninklijike Philips N.V. (“Philips”), Lite-On IT Corp. 11 of Taiwan (“Lite-On”), Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corp. (“PLDS”) and Philips & Lite-On 12 Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc. (“PLDS USA”) (collectively, the “Philips Defendants”). The Philips 13 Defendants shall have until Friday, November 22, 2013 to file a response thereto. 14 3. Undersigned counsel of DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP agree to accept service of the 15 Complaint in Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc., et al., Case No. 16 3:13-cv-03350-RS on behalf of Defendants BenQ Corporation and BenQ America Corp. 17 (collectively, the “BenQ Defendants”). The BenQ Defendants shall have until Friday, November 22, 18 2013 to file a response thereto. 19 4. Undersigned counsel of LATHAM & WATKINS LLP agree to accept service of the 20 Complaint in Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc., et al., Case No. 21 3:13-cv-03350-RS, on behalf of Defendants Toshiba Corporation (“Toshiba Corp.”), Toshiba 22 America Information Systems, Inc. (“TAIS”), Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp. 23 (“TSST”), and Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corp. (“TSSTK”). Each of Toshiba 24 Corp., TAIS, TSST and TSSTK shall have until Friday, November 22, 2013 to file a response 25 thereto. 26 5. Undersigned counsel of O’MELVENY AND MYERS LLP agree to accept service of 27 the Complaint in Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc., et al., Case No. 28 3:13-cv-03350-RS, on behalf of Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (“Samsung”) and JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS Case No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS; MDL No. 2143 1 Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“SEA”) (collectively, the “Samsung Defendants”). 2 Samsung Defendants shall have until Friday, November 22, 2013 to file a response thereto. 3 6. The Undersigned counsel of WINSTON & STRAWN LLP agree to accept service of the 4 Complaint in Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc., et al., Case No. 5 3:13-cv-03350-RS, on behalf of Defendant NEC Corporation (“NEC”). 6 Friday, November 22, 2013 to file a response thereto. NEC shall have until 7 8 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: September 9, 2013 ALSTON & BIRD LLP 10 /s/ Rodney J. Ganske 11 RODNEY J. GANSKE 1201 W. Peachtree Street NW Atlanta, Georgia 30309 TEL: (404) 881-7000 FAX: (404) 881-7777 rod.ganske@alston.com 12 13 14 Attorney for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. 15 16 17 Dated: September 9, 2013 ROPES & GRAY LLP 18 /s/ Mark S. Popofsky 19 MARK S. POPOFSKY One Metro Center 700 12th Street NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 2005-3948 TEL: (202) 508-4600 FAX: (202) 508-4650 mark.popofsky@ropesgray.com 20 21 22 23 Attorney for Defendants Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. and Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea, Inc. 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS Case No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS; MDL No. 2143 1 Dated: September 9, 2013 BAKER BOTTS LLP 2 /s/ Evan Werbel 3 EVAN WERBEL John Taladay 1299 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20004 TEL: (202) 383-7199 FAX: (202) 383-6610 evan.werbel@bakerbotts.com john.taladay@bakerbotts.com 4 5 6 7 Attorneys for Defendants Koninklijike Philips N.V., Lite-On IT Corp. of Taiwan, and Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corp., and Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc. 8 9 10 11 Dated: September 9, 2013 DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP /s/ Lisa M. Kaas 12 LISA M. KAAS Joel B. Kleinman 1825 Eye Street NW Washington, DC 20006-540 TEL: (202) 420-2200 FAX: (202) 420-2201 kaasl@dicksteinshapiro.com kleinmanj@dicksteinshapiro.com 13 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for Defendants BenQ Corporation and BenQ America Corp. 18 19 20 Dated: September 9, 2013 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 21 /s/ Ian Simmons 22 IAN SIMMONS 1625 Eye Street NW Washington, DC 20006 TEL: (202) 383-5106 FAX: (202) 383-5414 isimmons@omm.com 23 24 25 Attorney for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics of America, Inc. 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS Case No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS; MDL No. 2143 1 2 Dated: September 9, 2013 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP /s/ Belinda Lee 3 BELINDA LEE 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA, 94111 TEL: (415) 395-8240 FAX: (415) 395-8095 belinda.lee@lw.com 4 5 6 7 Attorney for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp., and Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp. Korea 8 9 10 11 Dated: September 9, 2013 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP /s/ Robert S. Pringle 12 15 ROBERT B. PRINGLE 101 California Street San Francisco, CA, 94111-5894 TEL: (415) 591-1000 FAX: (415) 591-1400 rpringle@winston.com 16 Attorney for Defendant NEC Corporation 13 14 17 18 19 20 21 * * * 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: _ 9/12/13 26 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS Case No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS; MDL No. 2143

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?