Dell Inc. et al v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. et al

Filing 69

STIPULATION AND ORDER (2266 in 3:10-md-02143-RS), (68 in 3:13-cv-03350-RS) REGARDING THE PLDS DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO DELLS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/5/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Stuart C. Plunkett (SBN 187971)
BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
101 California Street, Suite 3600
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
John M. Taladay (pro hac vice)
Evan J. Werbel (pro hac vice)
BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V.,
Lite-On IT Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital
Solutions Corporation, and Philips & Lite-On
Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc.

12
13

(Additional Counsel listed below)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15
16
17

MDL No. 3:10-md-2143 RS
IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE
PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

18

This Document Relates to

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING THE PLDS
DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO DELL’S
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. v. HitachiLG Data Storage Inc., et al.,
No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS

HON. RICHARD SEEBORG

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
THE PLDS DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER
TO DELL’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS

1
2

Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V., Lite-On IT Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital

3

Solutions Corporation, and Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc. (“PLDS

4

Defendants”), and Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. (“Dell”) (collectively, the “Parties”),

5

by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:

6

WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court’s Order entered on February 15, 2017 (Dkt. No. 2228),

7

defendants shall file their Supplemental Answers to Dell’s First Amended Complaint within 45

8

days of the filing of Dell’s First Amended Complaint, which the Parties calculate to be April 6,

9

2017;

10
11

WHEREAS, the Parties request additional time for the PLDS Defendants to respond to
Dell’s First Amended Complaint;

12
13

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned
counsel for the PLDS Defendants and Dell as follows:

14
15
16

1. The PLDS Defendants shall respond to Dell’s First Amended Complaint by April 21,
2017.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

17
18

Dated: April 4, 2017

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
THE PLDS DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER
TO DELL’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

-1-

No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS

1

BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

By: /s/ Evan J. Werbel
Evan J. Werbel
Stuart C. Plunkett (SBN 187971)
BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
101 California Street, Suite 3070
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
John M. Taladay (pro hac vice)
Evan J. Werbel (pro hac vice)
BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V.,
Lite-On IT, Corporation, Philips & Lite-On
Digital Solutions Corporation, and Philips &
Lite-On Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc.
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
By: /s/ Rodney J. Ganske_________
Rodney J. Ganske
Michael P. Kenny, Esq. (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Debra D. Bernstein, Esq. (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Rodney J. Ganske, Esq. (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Andrew J. Tuck, Esq. (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424
Tel: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
THE PLDS DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER
TO DELL’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

-2-

No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS

1
2
3
4
5
6

James M. Wagstaffe, Esq. (State Bar No. 95535)
[e-mail]
KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
100 Spear Street, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-1576
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell
Products L.P.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
THE PLDS DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER
TO DELL’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

-3-

No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS

1

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)

2

I, Evan J. Werbel, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained

3

from all signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of

4

America that the foregoing is true and correct.

5

Executed on April 4, 2017.

6
7
8

By: /s/ Evan J. Werbel
Evan J. Werbel

9
10
11
12
13

[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15
16
17

DATED:__________________________ ________________________________________
4/5/17
Honorable Richard G. Seeborg
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
THE PLDS DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER
TO DELL’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

-4-

No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS