Dell Inc. et al v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. et al
Filing
85
STIPULATION AND ORDER (2319 in 3:10-md-02143-RS), (84 in 3:13-cv-03350-RS) RE MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SPECIFIC TO THE DELL ACTION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/28/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Michael P. Kenny, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice)
mike.kenny@alston.com
Debra D. Bernstein, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice)
debra.bernstein@alston.com
Rodney J. Ganske, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice)
rod.ganske@alston.com
Andrew J. Tuck, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice)
Andy.tuck@alston.com
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424
Tel: (404) 881-7000
Facsimile: (404) 881-7777
11
James M. Wagstaffe, Esq. (State Bar No. 95535)
wagstaffe@kerrwagstaffe.com
KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
100 Spear Street, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-1576
TEL: (415) 371-8500
FAX: (415) 371-0500
12
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P.
9
10
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
IN RE: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Case No.: 3:13-cv-03350-RS
MDL No. 2143
This Document Relates to:
Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. v. Hitachi-LG
Data Storage Inc., et al., No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION
OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SPECIFIC TO
THE DELL ACTION
Hon. Richard Seeborg
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION Case No. 3:13-cv-3350-RS
1
Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. (collectively, “Dell”), and Defendants Samsung
2
Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Samsung
3
Storage Technology Corp., Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corp., and Toshiba
4
America Information Systems, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung and Toshiba Defendants”), by and
5
through undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree to the below:
6
WHEREAS, on January 25, 2017, this Court entered a Case Management Order (“Case
7
Management Order”) setting a schedule for summary judgment motions and other deadlines in the
8
multi-district litigation styled In re Optical Disk Drive Antitrust Litig., MDL No 2143 (the “MDL”)
9
(Dkt. No. 2211);
10
11
12
13
14
15
WHEREAS, the Case Management Order set a June 30, 2017 deadline for dispositive
motion(s) in the MDL;
WHEREAS, the Case Management Order set a July 21, 2017 deadline for Daubert motions in
the MDL;
WHEREAS, Dell has reached an agreement in principle with the Samsung and Toshiba
Defendants concerning a resolution between Dell and the Samsung and Toshiba Defendants;
16
WHEREAS, in order to complete settlement negotiations and finalize the terms of any
17
settlement agreement, and in the interests of judicial economy, Dell and the Samsung and Toshiba
18
Defendants request that the Court temporarily take off calendar the June 30 and July 21 deadlines for
19
Dell and the Samsung and Toshiba Defendants to file any dispositive and Daubert motions specific to
20
Dell in the Dell Action only (Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage Inc., et al.,
21
No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS, the “Dell Action”);
22
WHEREAS, in the unlikely event that an agreement between Dell and the Samsung and
23
Toshiba Defendants is not reached, counsel for Dell and the Samsung and Toshiba Defendants agree
24
to meet and confer in good faith to agree on and submit a joint report regarding the need for a revised
25
briefing schedule, and (if necessary) a proposed revised briefing schedule, for dispositive and/or
26
Daubert motions specific to the Dell Action, no later than July 14, 2017;
27
WHEREAS, that joint report (if necessary) will ensure that any dispositive and/or Daubert
28
motion briefing specific to the Dell Action is fully submitted at least seven (7) days prior to any hearing
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION Case No. 3:13-cv-3350-RS
1
on dispositive motions which is set in the MDL to ensure that dispositive motions specific to the Dell
2
Action could be heard on the same hearing date as other dispositive motions in the MDL; and
3
4
5
6
7
WHEREAS, nothing in this Stipulation alters or is intended to alter any other dates or Orders
of this Court in the MDL or in any other individual or related action;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY JOINTLY STIPULATED by and between the
undersigned counsel for Dell and the Samsung and Toshiba Defendants, as follows:
1.
The filing deadlines for Dell and the Samsung and Toshiba Defendants to file
8
dispositive and Daubert motions specific to the Dell Action are taken off calendar. No later than July
9
14, 2017, Dell and the Toshiba and Samsung Defendants shall submit to this Court a joint report
10
regarding the need for a revised briefing schedule, and (if necessary) a proposed revised briefing
11
schedule, for dispositive and Daubert motions specific to the Dell Action.
12
13
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: June 28, 2017
14
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
Counsel for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P.
/s/ Rodney J. Ganske
15
Dated: June 28, 2017
16
17
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
/s/ Ian Simmons
18
21
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation,
Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp., Toshiba
Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corp., and
Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
22
/s/ Belinda S Lee
19
Dated: June 28, 2017
20
ATTESTATION
23
24
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this
25
document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
26
Dated: June 28, 2017
/s/ Rodney J. Ganske
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION Case No. 3:13-cv-3350-RS
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND WITH GOOD CAUSE APPEARING
THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED
2
3
4
6/28/17
DATED: ____________________________
_______________________________
HONORABLE RICHARD G. SEEBORG
United States District Judge
Northern District of California
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION Case No. 3:13-cv-3350-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?