Dell Inc. et al v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. et al

Filing 85

STIPULATION AND ORDER (2319 in 3:10-md-02143-RS), (84 in 3:13-cv-03350-RS) RE MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SPECIFIC TO THE DELL ACTION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/28/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Michael P. Kenny, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) mike.kenny@alston.com Debra D. Bernstein, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) debra.bernstein@alston.com Rodney J. Ganske, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) rod.ganske@alston.com Andrew J. Tuck, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) Andy.tuck@alston.com ALSTON & BIRD LLP 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 Tel: (404) 881-7000 Facsimile: (404) 881-7777 11 James M. Wagstaffe, Esq. (State Bar No. 95535) wagstaffe@kerrwagstaffe.com KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 100 Spear Street, 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-1576 TEL: (415) 371-8500 FAX: (415) 371-0500 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. 9 10 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 IN RE: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION Case No.: 3:13-cv-03350-RS MDL No. 2143 This Document Relates to: Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage Inc., et al., No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SPECIFIC TO THE DELL ACTION Hon. Richard Seeborg 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION Case No. 3:13-cv-3350-RS 1 Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. (collectively, “Dell”), and Defendants Samsung 2 Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Samsung 3 Storage Technology Corp., Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corp., and Toshiba 4 America Information Systems, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung and Toshiba Defendants”), by and 5 through undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree to the below: 6 WHEREAS, on January 25, 2017, this Court entered a Case Management Order (“Case 7 Management Order”) setting a schedule for summary judgment motions and other deadlines in the 8 multi-district litigation styled In re Optical Disk Drive Antitrust Litig., MDL No 2143 (the “MDL”) 9 (Dkt. No. 2211); 10 11 12 13 14 15 WHEREAS, the Case Management Order set a June 30, 2017 deadline for dispositive motion(s) in the MDL; WHEREAS, the Case Management Order set a July 21, 2017 deadline for Daubert motions in the MDL; WHEREAS, Dell has reached an agreement in principle with the Samsung and Toshiba Defendants concerning a resolution between Dell and the Samsung and Toshiba Defendants; 16 WHEREAS, in order to complete settlement negotiations and finalize the terms of any 17 settlement agreement, and in the interests of judicial economy, Dell and the Samsung and Toshiba 18 Defendants request that the Court temporarily take off calendar the June 30 and July 21 deadlines for 19 Dell and the Samsung and Toshiba Defendants to file any dispositive and Daubert motions specific to 20 Dell in the Dell Action only (Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage Inc., et al., 21 No. 3:13-cv-03350-RS, the “Dell Action”); 22 WHEREAS, in the unlikely event that an agreement between Dell and the Samsung and 23 Toshiba Defendants is not reached, counsel for Dell and the Samsung and Toshiba Defendants agree 24 to meet and confer in good faith to agree on and submit a joint report regarding the need for a revised 25 briefing schedule, and (if necessary) a proposed revised briefing schedule, for dispositive and/or 26 Daubert motions specific to the Dell Action, no later than July 14, 2017; 27 WHEREAS, that joint report (if necessary) will ensure that any dispositive and/or Daubert 28 motion briefing specific to the Dell Action is fully submitted at least seven (7) days prior to any hearing STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION Case No. 3:13-cv-3350-RS 1 on dispositive motions which is set in the MDL to ensure that dispositive motions specific to the Dell 2 Action could be heard on the same hearing date as other dispositive motions in the MDL; and 3 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS, nothing in this Stipulation alters or is intended to alter any other dates or Orders of this Court in the MDL or in any other individual or related action; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY JOINTLY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned counsel for Dell and the Samsung and Toshiba Defendants, as follows: 1. The filing deadlines for Dell and the Samsung and Toshiba Defendants to file 8 dispositive and Daubert motions specific to the Dell Action are taken off calendar. No later than July 9 14, 2017, Dell and the Toshiba and Samsung Defendants shall submit to this Court a joint report 10 regarding the need for a revised briefing schedule, and (if necessary) a proposed revised briefing 11 schedule, for dispositive and Daubert motions specific to the Dell Action. 12 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 28, 2017 14 ALSTON & BIRD LLP Counsel for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. /s/ Rodney J. Ganske 15 Dated: June 28, 2017 16 17 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. /s/ Ian Simmons 18 21 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp., Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corp., and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. 22 /s/ Belinda S Lee 19 Dated: June 28, 2017 20 ATTESTATION 23 24 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this 25 document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 26 Dated: June 28, 2017 /s/ Rodney J. Ganske 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION Case No. 3:13-cv-3350-RS 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND WITH GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED 2 3 4 6/28/17 DATED: ____________________________ _______________________________ HONORABLE RICHARD G. SEEBORG United States District Judge Northern District of California 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION Case No. 3:13-cv-3350-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?