Hulsey et al v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company et al

Filing 38

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 37 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Briefing Schedule on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand filed by Landis and Gyr. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/17/13. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR. (State Bar No. 112279)
[e-mail]
MATTHEW J. BLASCHKE (State Bar No. 281938)
[e-mail]
CAMERON J. HOYLER (State Bar No. 273234)
[e-mail]
KING & SPALDING LLP
101 Second Street
Suite 2300
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

7
8

Attorneys for Defendant
LANDIS+GYR, INC.
(erroneously sued as “Landis and Gyr”)

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14

ROMAN HULSEY; CHRISTINA QUINN,
PATRICIA ADAMS, WINIFRED THOMAS,
LINDA CREEL, AND ABRAM PERLSTEIN,
Plaintiffs,

15
16

Case No. 3:13-cv-3355-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
TO REMAND

v.
CIV. L. R. 6-1(A)

17
18

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
COMPANY, WELLINGTON ENERGY INC.,
LANDIS AND GYR, AND DOES 1-20,
INCLUSIVE,

19

Hearing Date: October 31, 2013
Time:
1:30 p.m.
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
Courtroom: 5 – 17th Floor

Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND
Case No. 3:13-cv-3355-EMC

1
2
3

TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR
ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Plaintiffs and Defendants Landis+Gyr, Inc. (“L+G”) and Wellington Power Corporation

4

(“Wellington”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows

5

pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a):

6

1. Plaintiffs filed their Motion to Remand (Dkt. 23) on August 19, 2013. On August 27,

7

2013, the Court entered an Order approving the August 26, 2013 stipulation between

8

Plaintiffs, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (“PG&E”), Wellington, and L+G, to continue

9

the hearing date for Plaintiffs Motion to Remand until October 31, 2013, with any

10

opposition(s) to be filed no later than September 17, 2013, and Plaintiffs’ reply brief to be

11

filed no later than September 24, 2013 (See Dkt. 34, p. 2:21-27).

12

2. On September 12, 2013, the Court approved the Parties’ subsequent stipulation to further

13

extend the briefing schedule for Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Dkt. 36), making PG&E’s

14

opposition due no later than September 20, 2013, and Plaintiffs’ reply due on September

15

27, 2013. That stipulation did not extend the deadlines for L+G and Wellington’s

16

opposition(s) to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand.

17
18
19

3. Plaintiffs, L+G, and Wellington agree that it would be prudent for the briefing schedule
on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand to be uniform among all parties.
4. Therefore, Plaintiffs, L+G, and Wellington agree that L+G and Wellington’s

20

opposition(s), if any, to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand shall be filed no later than

21

September 20, 2013, and Plaintiffs’ reply shall be filed no later than September 27, 2013.

22

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

23

DATED: September 12, 2013

KING & SPALDING LLP

24
25
26
27

By:

/s/ Donald F. Zimmer, Jr.
DONALD F. ZIMMER JR.
Attorney for Defendant
LANDIS+GYR, INC.

28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND
Case No. 3:13-cv-3355-EMC

1

DATED: September 12, 2013

LAW OFFICES OF PAUL R. OVERETT

2
By: /s/ Paul R. Overett
PAUL R. OVERETT
Attorney for Plaintiffs

3
4

.

5
6

DATED: September 12, 2013

BASSI EDLIN HUIE & BLUM LLP

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

By: /s/ Noel Edlin
NOEL EDLIN
Attorney for Defendant WELLINGTON
POWER CORPORATION
.

ATTESTATION CLAUSE
I, Donald F. Zimmer, Jr., am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file
this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I
hereby attest that Paul R. Overett and Noel Edlin have concurred in this filing.

15
16

/s/ Donald F. Zimmer, Jr.
DONALD F. ZIMMER JR.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND
Case No. 3:13-cv-3355-EMC

1

The Court, having considered the parties’ stipulation pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a),

2

hereby orders that L+G and Wellington’s opposition(s) to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand

3

(Dkt. 23) shall be filed no later than September 20, 2013, and Plaintiffs’ reply shall be filed no

4

later than September 27, 2013.

5
IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT

12

________________________________
THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
. Chen
UNITEDdSTATES DISTRICT JUDGE
dwar M
Judge E

NO

11

R NIA

10

TED

GRAN

FO

9

9/17/13

Date: ______________

UNIT
ED

8

ER

14

A

H

13

RT
U
O

S

7

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

LI

6

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND
Case No. 3:13-cv-3355-EMC

1
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned counsel for Defendant Landis+Gyr, Inc. hereby certifies that a true and

3

correct copy of the foregoing document was filed with the Court and served electronically

4

through the CM-ECF (electronic case filing) system to all counsel of record to those registered to

5

receive a Notice of Electronic Filing for this case on September 12, 2013.

6
7
8
9
10

/s/ Donald F. Zimmer, Jr.
DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR.
Attorney for Defendant
LANDIS+GYR, INC.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND
Case No. 3:13-cv-3355-EMC