Kasperzyk v. Shelter Security Services, Inc. et al

Filing 115

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/6/15. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JORDAN KASPERZYK, 8 Plaintiff, 9 No. C13-3358 EMC/TEH ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. (Docket Nos. 92 and 98) SHETLER SECURITY SERVICES, INC., et al., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 13 14 On February 26, 2015, this Court held a hearing on a summary judgment motion brought by 15 Defendants Shetler Security Services, Inc. and Michael Shetler (collectively, SSS). Docket No. 98. 16 The Court also heard argument on a summary judgment motion brought by Defendants Lucasfilm 17 Ltd.; Letterman Digital Arts Ltd.; and Skywalker Properties (collectively, Lucasfilm). Docket No. 18 92. 19 On March 6, 2015, this case was reassigned to the Honorable Thelton Henderson for all 20 further proceedings. Docket No. 114. In order to aide Judge Henderson and the parties in preparing 21 this case for trial, the Court hereby provides its summary judgment rulings. The undersigned will 22 issue a fuller Order containing this Court’s reasoning for its summary judgment rulings in due 23 course: 24 A. 25 Docket No. 92 (Lucasfilm’s Motion for Summary Judgment) The Court DENIES Lucasfilm’s motion for summary judgment in its entirety. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 B. Docket No. 98 (SSS’s Motion for Summary Judgment) 2 The Court GRANTS SSS’s motion for summary judgment on the following claims1: Claim 3 4 (Breach of Contract Reached at “Arbitration”); Claim 6 (Retaliation); Claim 9 (Fraud); and Claim 4 10 (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress). The Court denies the remainder of SSS’s motion. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 Dated: March 6, 2015 _________________________ 9 EDWARD M. CHEN 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 See Docket No. 88-1 (Fourth Amended Complaint). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?