Kasperzyk v. Shelter Security Services, Inc. et al
Filing
115
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/6/15. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JORDAN KASPERZYK,
8
Plaintiff,
9
No. C13-3358 EMC/TEH
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v.
(Docket Nos. 92 and 98)
SHETLER SECURITY SERVICES,
INC., et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Defendants.
___________________________________/
13
14
On February 26, 2015, this Court held a hearing on a summary judgment motion brought by
15
Defendants Shetler Security Services, Inc. and Michael Shetler (collectively, SSS). Docket No. 98.
16
The Court also heard argument on a summary judgment motion brought by Defendants Lucasfilm
17
Ltd.; Letterman Digital Arts Ltd.; and Skywalker Properties (collectively, Lucasfilm). Docket No.
18
92.
19
On March 6, 2015, this case was reassigned to the Honorable Thelton Henderson for all
20
further proceedings. Docket No. 114. In order to aide Judge Henderson and the parties in preparing
21
this case for trial, the Court hereby provides its summary judgment rulings. The undersigned will
22
issue a fuller Order containing this Court’s reasoning for its summary judgment rulings in due
23
course:
24
A.
25
Docket No. 92 (Lucasfilm’s Motion for Summary Judgment)
The Court DENIES Lucasfilm’s motion for summary judgment in its entirety.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
B.
Docket No. 98 (SSS’s Motion for Summary Judgment)
2
The Court GRANTS SSS’s motion for summary judgment on the following claims1: Claim
3
4 (Breach of Contract Reached at “Arbitration”); Claim 6 (Retaliation); Claim 9 (Fraud); and Claim
4
10 (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress). The Court denies the remainder of SSS’s motion.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: March 6, 2015
_________________________
9
EDWARD M. CHEN
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
See Docket No. 88-1 (Fourth Amended Complaint).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?