Kasperzyk v. Shelter Security Services, Inc. et al
Filing
80
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James for Settlement, STIPULATION AND ORDER re 79 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Requesting Early Settlement Conference filed by Letterman Digital Arts Center Ltd, Lucasfilm Ltd., Letterman Digital Arts, Ltd. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/16/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2014)
1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
LISA BARNETT SWEEN, SB# 191155
Email: Lisa.Sween@lewisbrisbois.com
2
STEPHANIE T. YANG, SB# 280006
Email: Stephanie.Yang@lewisbrisbois.com
3
333 Bush Street, Suite 1100
4 San Francisco, California 94104-2872
Telephone: 415.362.2580
5 Facsimile: 415.434.0882
6 Attorneys for Defendant
LETTERMAN DIGITAL ARTS LTD. AND
7 LUCASFILM LTD.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11 JORDAN KASPERZYK,
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14 SHETLER SECURITY SERVICES, INC.,
LUCASFILM LTD., LETTERMAN
15 DIGITAL ARTS LTD., MICHAEL
SHETLER and Does 1 through 100,
16
Defendants.
17
CASE NO. 13- CV 13-03358 EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER REQUESTING EARLY
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Trial Date:
July 6, 2015
18
19
Per discussions at the May 28 ADR conference, Defendants Letterman Digital Arts Ltd.,
20 Lucasfilm Ltd., Shetler Security Services, Inc., Michael Shetler, and Plaintiff hereby stipulate as
21 follows:
22
The parties agree that a settlement conference with a magistrate judge is appropriate for
23 this matter. The parties respectfully request that the Court permit a settlement conference with one
24 of the following magistrate judges pending availability, in order of preference:
25
26
2. James Spero (all Defendants’ second preference)
27
LEWIS
1. Maria Elena James (all parties’ agreed upon first preference)
3. Laurel Beeler (Plaintiff’s second preference)
28 ///
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4831-3098-4731.1
CV 13-03358 EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
1
2
4. Nathaniel Cousins and Jacqueline Corley (in no particular order of preference amongst
the two judges)
3
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
Dated: June 11, 2014
/s/ Stephanie T. Yang
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
Lisa Barnett Sween
Stephanie T. Yang
Counsel for Defendants Lucasfilm Ltd. and
Letterman Digital Arts Ltd.
Dated: June 11, 2014
/s/ James Costello
THE LAW OFFICES OF JAMES F. COSTELLO
James Costello
Counsel for Plaintiff Jordan Kasperzyk
Dated: June 11, 2014
/s/ Katarzyna W. Nowak
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP
Katarzyna W. Nowak
Counsel for Defendants Shetler Security Services,
Inc. and Michael Shetler
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
PROPOSED ORDER
The parties are hereby ordered to participate in a settlement conference with one of the five
17 magistrate judges noted above. This case is referred to Magistrate Maria-Elena James
Dated: 6/16/14
S
UNIT
ED
21
22
RT
24
DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO
26
. Chen
ward M
udge Ed
J
ER
A
H
25
C
Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge
NO
23
TA
RT
U
O
20
DISTR
ICT
S
_______________________________
TE
R NIA
19
Settlement conference is to be completed by 9/30/14.
FO
for settlement conference.
LI
18
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
27
LEWIS
28
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4831-3098-4731.1
CV 13-03358 EMC
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
1
FEDERAL COURT PROOF OF SERVICE
2
Jordan Kasperzyk v. Shetler Security Services, Inc.
USDC-Northern District Case No. CV 13-03358 EMC
3
File No. 33286.03
4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
5
At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to the action. My
6 business address is 333 Bush Street, Suite 1100, San Francisco, CA 94104-2872. I am employed
in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made.
7
On June 11, 2014, I served the following document(s):
8
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE EARLY SETTLEMENT
9 CONFERENCE
10
I served the documents on the following persons at the following addresses (including fax
numbers and e-mail addresses, if applicable):
11
SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST
12
The documents were served by the following means:
13
14
(BY COURT’S CM/ECF SYSTEM) Pursuant to Local Rule, I electronically filed the
documents with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which sent notification
of that filing to the persons listed above.
15
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and the
16 State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
17
Executed on June 11, 2014, at San Francisco, California.
18
19
/s/ Gloria Joyce
Gloria Joyce
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
LEWIS
28
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4831-3098-4731.1
CV 13-03358 EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
1
SERVICE LIST
Kasperzyk v. Shelter Security Services, Inc., et al.
USDC – Northern District Case No. 13-03358 EMC
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Geraldine Armendariz, Esq.
Law Offices of Geraldine Armendariz
870 Market Street, Suite 1175
San Francisco, CA 94102
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Tel: 415-986-0873
Fax: 415-986-0276
Email: gerarmesq@gmail.com
James F. Costello, Esq.
Law Offices of James F. Costello
18 Brooke Circle
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Tel: 415-388-9060
Fax: 415-388-9070
Email: jfcostellobarrister@gmail.com
Roger W. Haines, Esq.
Law Office of Roger W. Haines
13125 Shalimar Place
Del Mar, CA 92014
Tel: 858-36-5505
Email: bhaines@san.rr.com
Katarzyna W. Nowak, Esq.
Tel: 415-490-9000
Fisher & Phillips LLP
Fax: 415-490-9001
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2050
Email: knowak@laborlawyers.com
San Francisco, CA 94111
Attorneys for Co-Defendant Shetler
Security Services
Clarence M. Belnavis, Esq.
Fisher & Phillips LLP
111 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 4040
Portland, OR 97204
Tel: 503-242-4262
Fax: 503-242-4263
Email: cbelnavis@laborlawyers.com
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
LEWIS
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
28
4831-3098-4731.1
CV 13-03358 EMC
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONFIRMING DISCUSSIONS AT MAY 28, 2014 ADR
CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?