Divincent v. Divincent et al
Filing
41
ORDER vacating briefing and hearing schedules on 9 11 19 Defendants' motions pending consideration of 23 Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend and remand. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/26/13. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2013)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
MICHAEL DIVINCENT,
6
7
8
NO. C13-3360 TEH
Plaintiff,
ORDER VACATING BRIEFING
AND HEARING SCHEDULES
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS
v.
ROBERT DIVINCENT, et al.,
9
Defendants.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
This matter is currently before the Court on four motions: a motion for leave to amend
12
and remand filed by Plaintiff Michael DiVincent; a motion to compel arbitration or to
13
dismiss filed by the E*Trade Defendants; and motions to dismiss and strike filed by
14
Defendant David P. Gardner and the DiVincent Defendants. To promote efficiency and
15
conserve resources, the Court now VACATES the briefing and hearing schedules on all of
16
Defendants’ motions so that it can first determine whether this matter should be remanded.
17
In their responses to Plaintiff’s motion, Defendants shall address whether Plaintiff has
18
the right to amend his complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B) and
19
whether federal jurisdiction over the amended complaint would be proper. If, as Plaintiff
20
contends, the amended complaint contains no federal questions, this Court is not inclined to
21
maintain jurisdiction over this case even if removal based on the original complaint were
22
proper.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: 08/26/13
27
28
THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?