Divincent v. Divincent et al

Filing 41

ORDER vacating briefing and hearing schedules on 9 11 19 Defendants' motions pending consideration of 23 Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend and remand. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/26/13. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2013)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 MICHAEL DIVINCENT, 6 7 8 NO. C13-3360 TEH Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULES ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS v. ROBERT DIVINCENT, et al., 9 Defendants. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 This matter is currently before the Court on four motions: a motion for leave to amend 12 and remand filed by Plaintiff Michael DiVincent; a motion to compel arbitration or to 13 dismiss filed by the E*Trade Defendants; and motions to dismiss and strike filed by 14 Defendant David P. Gardner and the DiVincent Defendants. To promote efficiency and 15 conserve resources, the Court now VACATES the briefing and hearing schedules on all of 16 Defendants’ motions so that it can first determine whether this matter should be remanded. 17 In their responses to Plaintiff’s motion, Defendants shall address whether Plaintiff has 18 the right to amend his complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B) and 19 whether federal jurisdiction over the amended complaint would be proper. If, as Plaintiff 20 contends, the amended complaint contains no federal questions, this Court is not inclined to 21 maintain jurisdiction over this case even if removal based on the original complaint were 22 proper. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: 08/26/13 27 28 THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?