Rothman v. U.S. Bank National Association et al

Filing 100

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS Plaintiff is ordered to immediately submit a chambers copy of the "Motion for Leave to File First Supplemental Complaint." Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 17, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 MARSHAL ROTHMAN, 6 Plaintiff, No. 3:13-cv-03381-MMC 7 v. 8 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court Defendant. 10 / ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT’S STANDING ORDERS 11 12 On November 12, 2014 plaintiff electronically filed a document titled “Motion for 13 Leave to File First Supplemental Complaint.” Plaintiff has violated the Civil Local Rules of 14 this District and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a 15 paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” 16 See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The 17 Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2. 18 Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the 19 Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above- 20 referenced document. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if he fails in the future to comply with 21 the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed 22 document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the 23 record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely 24 provided to the Court. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: November 17, 2014 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?