Rothman v. U.S. Bank National Association et al

Filing 115

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT The motion is GRANTED. Rothman shall file his First Supplemental Complaint no later than December 29, 2014. The parties are directed to meet and confer to discuss any changes, if necessary, to the current pretrial and/or trial schedule, and should the parties come to an agreement, to file a proposed revised schedule. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, they are directed to file a joint request for a status conference for the purpose of resolving any disagreement as to the schedule. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 19, 2014. (mmclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MARSHAL ROTHMAN,

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

12
13

No. 3:13-cv-03381-MMC

Plaintiff,

11

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST
SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT

v.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
Defendant.

14

/

15
16

Before the Court is plaintiff Marshal Rothman’s (“Rothman”) “Motion for Leave to File

17

First Supplemental Complaint,” filed November 12, 2014. Defendant U.S. Bank National

18

Association (“U.S. Bank”) has filed opposition, to which Rothman has replied. Having read

19

and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court

20

finds the matter suitable for determination on the parties’ respective written submissions,1

21

and rules as follows.

22

For the reasons stated in the motion and reply, the Court finds good cause for the

23

relief requested therein and, accordingly, the motion is hereby GRANTED. Rothman shall

24

file his First Supplemental Complaint no later than December 29, 2014.

25

In light of the above, the parties are hereby DIRECTED to meet and confer to

26

discuss any changes, if necessary, to the current pretrial and/or trial schedule, and should

27
28
1

By order entered December 18, 2014, the parties were advised that, due to a
conflict with an ongoing jury trial, the hearing on the motion was vacated.

1

the parties come to an agreement, to file a proposed revised schedule. If the parties are

2

unable to reach an agreement, they are directed to file a joint request for a status

3

conference for the purpose of resolving any disagreement as to the schedule.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: December 19, 2014
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2