Rothman v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
Filing
122
AMENDED ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, the pretrial/trial schedule is modified. All other dates not modified by this order shall remain as set forth in the Amended Pretrial Order. The sole amendment is to correct a typographical error as to the date of the pretrial conference. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 6, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2015)
Case3:13-cv-03381-MMC Document117 Filed12/24/14 Page1 of 4
Document120 Filed01/05/15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
NOSSAMAN LLP
ROBERT S. MCWHORTER (SBN 226186)
rmcwhorter@nossaman.com
WALTER C. DAUTERMAN, JR. (SBN 282264)
wdauterman@nossaman.com
621 Capitol Mall, 25th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: 916.442.8888
Facsimile: 916.442.0382
Attorneys for Defendant
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR
IN INTEREST TO THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR DOWNEY SAVINGS
AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, F.A.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
MARSHAL ROTHMAN
17
18
19
3:13-cv-03381-MMC
Plaintiff,
15
16
Case No:
vs.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
& OLD REPUBLIC DIVERSIFIED
SERVICES, INC. d/b/a OLD REPUBLIC
DEFAULT MANAGEMENTS SERVICES
SECOND STIPULATION AND AMENDED
[PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING
PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER*
Complaint Filed: July 19, 2013
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
*The sole amendment is to correct a typographical error as to the date of the Pretrial Conference.
28
144875_2
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER
Case No.: 3:13-cv-03381-MMC
Case3:13-cv-03381-MMC Document117 Filed12/24/14 Page2 of 4
Document120 Filed01/05/15
1
Defendant, U.S. Bank National Association, Successor in Interest to the Federal Deposit
2
Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A.
3
(“U.S. Bank”) and Plaintiff, Marshal Rothman (“Plaintiff”) (collectively, the “Parties”), through
4
the undersigned counsel hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
5
6
7
1.
On May 30, 2014, this Court entered a Pretrial Preparation Order. [Docket
No. 74.]
2.
On November 03, 2014, this Court entered an Order Amending the Pretrial
8
Preparation Order (the “Amended Pretrial Order”). [Docket No. 97] The Amended Pretrial
9
Order provided the following schedule:
10
Event
New Deadline
11
Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff
February 5, 2015
12
Designation of Opening Experts
February 26, 2015
13
Designation of Rebuttal Experts
March 13, 2015
14
Expert Discovery Cutoff
April 6, 2015
15
Status Conference Statement Due
April 3, 2015
16
Status Conference
April 10, 2015 at 10:30 a.m.
17
Deadline to File Dispositive Motions
April 24, 2015 (noticed for
hearing 35 days afterward)
Pretrial Conference
July 14, 2015 at 3:00 p.m.
Trial Date:
July 27, 2015
Trial Length
7 to 10 days
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
3.
On December 19, 2013, this Court entered an order granting leave to Plaintiff to
file a First Supplemental Complaint no later than December 29, 2014 and directing the Parties to
meet and confer to discuss any changes, if necessary, to the current pretrial and/or trial schedule.
[Docket No. 115.]
4.
The Parties met and conferred and agreed to the following changes to the
pretrial/trial schedule:
28
144875_2
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER
-1-
Case No.: 3:13-cv-03381-MMC
Case3:13-cv-03381-MMC Document117 Filed12/24/14 Page3 of 4
Document120 Filed01/05/15
1
Event
New Deadline
2
Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff
March 27, 2015
3
Designation of Opening Experts
April 17, 2015
4
Designation of Rebuttal Experts
May 4, 2015
5
Expert Discovery Cutoff
June 6, 2015
6
Status Conference Statement Due
June 12, 2015
7
Status Conference
June ___, 2015 at 10:30 a.m.
8
Deadline to File Dispositive Motions
June 26, 2015 (noticed for
hearing 35 days afterward)
Pretrial Conference
To be determined by Court
Trial Date:
To be determined by Court
Trial Length
7 to 10 days
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE shall be held before Magistrate Judge Nathanael
9
10
11
12
13
Cousins and scheduled to take place no later than 30 days prior to the Pretrial
14
Conference.
15
16
17
18
All other dates set forth in the Amended Pretrial Order shall remain the same.
THE FOREGOING IS STIPULATED AND AGREED TO BY:
Dated: December 24, 2014
By:
Randolph Gaw
Randolph Gaw
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARSHAL ROTHMAN
19
20
21
22
GAW │ POE LLP
Dated: December 24, 2014
NOSSAMAN LLP
By:
Robert S. McWhorter
Robert S. McWhorter
Attorneys for Defendant
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR
IN INTEREST TO THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT
INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR
DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, F.A.
23
24
25
26
27
28
144875_2
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER
-2-
Case No.: 3:13-cv-03381-MMC
Case3:13-cv-03381-MMC Document117 Filed12/24/14 Page4 of 4
Document120 Filed01/05/15
1
2
ORDER
3
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. THE PRETRIAL/TRIAL
4
SCHEDULE SHALL BE MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS:
5
D__________________, 2014
Event
Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff
Designation of Opening Experts
Designation of Rebuttal Experts
Expert Discovery Cutoff
Status Conference Statement Due
Status Conference
Deadline to File Dispositive Motions
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
________________________________________
New Deadline
U.S. District Court Judge
March 27, 2015
April 17, 2015
May 4, 2015
June 6, 2015
June 12, 2015
June 19, 2015 at 10:30 a.m.
June 26, 2015 (noticed for
hearing 35 days afterward)
15
Pretrial Conference
September 11, 2015 at 3:00 p.m.
Trial Date
September 28, 2015
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE shall be held before Magistrate Judge Nathaniel
Cousins and scheduled to take place no later than 30 days prior to the Pretrial
Conference.
All other dates set forth in the Amended Pretrial Order shall remain the same.
17
18
Dated: January 6 2015
5,
___________________________
U.S. District Court Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
144875_2
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER
-3-
Case No.: 3:13-cv-03381-MMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?