Rothman v. U.S. Bank National Association et al

Filing 127

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 126 Discovery Letter Brief.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2015)

Download PDF
Case3:13-cv-03381-MMC Document126 Filed01/23/15 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LECLAIRRYAN ROBERT S. MCWHORTER (SBN 226186) robert.mcwhorter@leclairryan.com 980 9th Street, 16th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916.449.9690 Facsimile: 916.449.9694 Attorneys for Defendant U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, F.A. 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 MARSHAL ROTHMAN 16 17 vs. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION & OLD REPUBLIC DIVERSIFIED SERVICES, INC. d/b/a OLD REPUBLIC DEFAULT MANAGEMENTS SERVICES 18 Defendants. 19 CV 13 3381 Plaintiff, 14 15 Case No: FIRST AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER Complaint Filed: July 19, 2013 Trial Date: June 22, 2015 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FIRST AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER Case No.: CV 13 3381 Case3:13-cv-03381-MMC Document126 Filed01/23/15 Page2 of 3 1 Defendant, U.S. Bank National Association, Successor in Interest to the Federal Deposit 2 Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A. 3 (“U.S. Bank”) and Plaintiff, Marshal Rothman (“Plaintiff”) (collectively, the “Parties”), through 4 the undersigned counsel hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 5 1. On December 17, 2014, this Court entered an Order (the “Discovery Order”) 6 directing the Parties to immediately meet and confer regarding the issues raised in Plaintiff’s 7 Motion to Compel and to file a joint discovery letter by December 31, 2014. [Docket No: 113] 8 This Court subsequently continued the deadline to file a joint discovery letter from December 31, 9 2014 to January 28, 2015. [Docket No. 118] 10 2. Plaintiff served upon U.S. Bank the following written discovery requests: 11 (i) Plaintiff’s Fourth Set of Request for Production of Documents, (ii) Plaintiff’s Fourth Set of 12 Interrogatories, and (iii) Plaintiff’s Third Request for Admissions (collectively, the “Discovery 13 Requests”). 14 3. Since January 14, 2015, the Parties engaged in extensive settlement negotiations. 15 The Parties are optimistic that they will reach a settlement. To allow the Parties time to finalize 16 their negotiations, the Parties request that this Court extend the deadline to file a joint discovery 17 letter from January 28, 2015 to February 9, 2015. Also, the Parties agree that the deadline for 18 U.S. Bank to serve responses to the Discovery Requests shall be February 9, 2015. 19 THE FOREGOING IS STIPULATED AND AGREED TO BY: 20 Dated: January 23, 2015 21 GAW │ POE LLP By: 22 Attorneys for Plaintiff MARSHAL ROTHMAN 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/Randolph Gaw Randolph Gaw Dated: January 23, 2015 LECLAIRRYAN By: /s/Robert S. McWhorter Robert S. McWhorter Attorneys for Defendant U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO THE FDIC AS RECEIVER FOR DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, F.A. -1- FIRST AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER Case No.: CV 13 3381 Case3:13-cv-03381-MMC Document126 Filed01/23/15 Page3 of 3 1 ORDER 2 3 4 Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation, this Court finds good cause to grant the relief requested therein. 5 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Parties’ deadline to file 6 a joint discovery letter is extended from January 28, 2015 to February 9, 2015 and U.S. Bank’s 7 deadline to respond to the Discovery Requests is extended until February 9, 2015. 8 9 10 23 Dated: January _____, 2015 ________________________________________ U.S. District Court Magistrate Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- FIRST AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER Case No.: CV 13 3381

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?