Rothman v. U.S. Bank National Association et al

Filing 28

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION, CONSTRUED AS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. The Court construes plaintiff's motion as a motion for a preliminary injunction and continues the hearing to October 4, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 29, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 MARSHAL ROTHMAN, No. C 13-3381 MMC Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION & OLD REPUBLIC DIVERSIFIED SERVICES, INC. d/b/a OLD REPUBLIC DEFAULT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION, CONSTRUED AS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Defendants. 12 / 13 14 Before the Court is plaintiff’s “Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and 15 Order to Show Cause,” filed August 28, 2013 and noticed for hearing on August 30, 2013, 16 by which motion plaintiff seeks a temporary restraining order enjoining defendants from 17 conducting a non-judicial foreclosure of his property. Plaintiff has not asserted defendants 18 have noticed a sale of his property or otherwise shown that any claimed irreparable injury is 19 imminent. 20 Accordingly, the Court finds plaintiff has failed to show the matter should be heard 21 on two day’s notice; rather, the hearing on plaintiff’s motion, construed as a motion for a 22 preliminary injunction, is hereby CONTINUED to October 4, 2013, and the briefing 23 deadlines set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-3 shall apply thereto.1 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: August 29, 2013 26 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 27 28 1 Should circumstances change, plaintiff may file a motion to shorten time pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?