Rothman v. U.S. Bank National Association et al

Filing 43

ORDER CONTINUING OCTOBER 4, 2013 HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION TO OCTOBER 18, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 2, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 MARSHALL ROTHMAN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 No. C-13-3381 MMC v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION & OLD REPUBLIC DEFAULT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, 15 Defendants. 16 ORDER CONTINUING OCTOBER 4, 2013 HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION TO OCTOBER 18, 2013 / 17 Before the Court is plaintiff Marshall Rothman’s Ex Parte Motion for Temporary 18 Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause, construed by the Court in its August 29, 19 2013, order as a motion for preliminary injunction and scheduled for hearing October 4, 20 2013. Also before the Court are defendants’ respective motions to dismiss, scheduled for 21 hearing October 18, 2013. Because “[a] plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must 22 establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits,” see Winter v. Natural Res. Def. 23 Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008), the Court finds it appropriate to consider the two 24 motions together. 25 // 26 // 27 28 Accordingly, the hearing on plaintiff’s motion is hereby CONTINUED to October 18, 1 2 3 2013. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: October 2, 2013 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?