Netgear, Inc. v. Asustek Computer, Inc. et al
Filing
49
ORDER: Further Case Management Conference set for 3/7/14 is continued to 4/25/2014 03:00 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 2/28/14., Motions terminated: 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Management Conference filed by Netgear, Inc. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2014)
1
7
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
ROBERT A. VAN NEST - # 84065
rvannest@kvn.com
R. JAMES SLAUGHTER - # 192813
rslaughter@kvn.com
WILLIAM S. HICKS - # 256095
whicks@kvn.com
SHILPI AGARWAL - # 270749
sagarwal@kvn.com
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone:
(415) 391-5400
Facsimile:
(415) 397-7188
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff Netgear, Inc.
2
3
4
5
6
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
NETGEAR, INC.,
No. C 13-3405 SI
14
Plaintiff,
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
15
v.
16
ASUSTEK COMPUTER, INC., et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
No. C 13-3405 SI
805914.01
1
STIPULATION
2
3
Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as
follows and respectfully request that the Court approve and give effect to their stipulation.
4
WHEREAS, a Further Case Management Conference is currently set for March 7, 2014;
5
WHEREAS, the parties have scheduled an in-person meeting on March 10, 2014, to
6
7
discuss the possibility of resolving their dispute informally;
WHEREAS, in view of their settlement discussions, the parties agree that it would be
8
9
10
most efficient to vacate the March 7, 2014, Further Case Management Conference, and
reschedule it for a date in April that is convenient for the Court;
11
WHEREAS, the Court’s staff has advised counsel for the parties that, subject to the
12
13
14
15
16
17
Court’s approval, the Further Case Management Conference could be rescheduled for April 25,
2014.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Further Case Management
Conference currently set for March 7, 2014, shall be vacated and reset for April 25, 2014.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
18
19
Dated: February 26, 2014.
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
20
21
By:
24
/s/ R. James Slaughter
ROBERT A. VAN NEST
R. JAMES SLAUGHTER
WILLIAM S. HICKS
SHILPI AGARWAL
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, California 94111
25
Attorneys for Plaintiff Netgear, Inc.
22
23
26
27
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
No. C 13-3405 SI
1
FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C.
2
By:
3
4
5
6
/s/ Natalie L. Arbaugh (with permission)
NATALIE L. ARBAUGH (admitted pro
hac vice)
JOHN MICHAEL GADDIS (admitted pro
hac vice)
1717 Main Street, Suite 5000
Dallas, TX 75201
JOHN FARRELL
500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, CA 94063
7
8
9
Attorneys for Defendants Asus Computer
Inc. and Asus Computer International,
Inc.
10
11
12
13
CERTIFICATION
14
15
I, R. James Slaughter, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used
16
to file the foregoing Joint Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference. I hereby attest
17
that Natalie L. Arbaugh, counsel for Defendants, concurred in this filing.
18
19
Dated: February 26, 2014
20
21
/s/ R. James Slaughter
R. James Slaughter
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
No. C 13-3405 SI
1
PROPOSED ORDER
2
3
4
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
5
1.
The Further Case Management Conference currently set for March 7, 2014, is
6
7
hereby vacated; and
8
2.
9
The Further Case Management Conference shall be reset for April 25, 2014 at 3:00
p.m.
10
11
2/28/14
Dated: _______________
_______________________________
Hon. Susan Illston
U.S. District Court Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
No. C 13-3405 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?