Netgear, Inc. v. Asustek Computer, Inc. et al

Filing 49

ORDER: Further Case Management Conference set for 3/7/14 is continued to 4/25/2014 03:00 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 2/28/14., Motions terminated: 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Management Conference filed by Netgear, Inc. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2014)

Download PDF
1 7 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP ROBERT A. VAN NEST - # 84065 rvannest@kvn.com R. JAMES SLAUGHTER - # 192813 rslaughter@kvn.com WILLIAM S. HICKS - # 256095 whicks@kvn.com SHILPI AGARWAL - # 270749 sagarwal@kvn.com 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff Netgear, Inc. 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 NETGEAR, INC., No. C 13-3405 SI 14 Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 15 v. 16 ASUSTEK COMPUTER, INC., et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE No. C 13-3405 SI 805914.01 1 STIPULATION 2 3 Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows and respectfully request that the Court approve and give effect to their stipulation. 4 WHEREAS, a Further Case Management Conference is currently set for March 7, 2014; 5 WHEREAS, the parties have scheduled an in-person meeting on March 10, 2014, to 6 7 discuss the possibility of resolving their dispute informally; WHEREAS, in view of their settlement discussions, the parties agree that it would be 8 9 10 most efficient to vacate the March 7, 2014, Further Case Management Conference, and reschedule it for a date in April that is convenient for the Court; 11 WHEREAS, the Court’s staff has advised counsel for the parties that, subject to the 12 13 14 15 16 17 Court’s approval, the Further Case Management Conference could be rescheduled for April 25, 2014. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Further Case Management Conference currently set for March 7, 2014, shall be vacated and reset for April 25, 2014. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 18 19 Dated: February 26, 2014. KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 20 21 By: 24 /s/ R. James Slaughter ROBERT A. VAN NEST R. JAMES SLAUGHTER WILLIAM S. HICKS SHILPI AGARWAL 633 Battery Street San Francisco, California 94111 25 Attorneys for Plaintiff Netgear, Inc. 22 23 26 27 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE No. C 13-3405 SI 1 FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C. 2 By: 3 4 5 6 /s/ Natalie L. Arbaugh (with permission) NATALIE L. ARBAUGH (admitted pro hac vice) JOHN MICHAEL GADDIS (admitted pro hac vice) 1717 Main Street, Suite 5000 Dallas, TX 75201 JOHN FARRELL 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants Asus Computer Inc. and Asus Computer International, Inc. 10 11 12 13 CERTIFICATION 14 15 I, R. James Slaughter, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used 16 to file the foregoing Joint Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference. I hereby attest 17 that Natalie L. Arbaugh, counsel for Defendants, concurred in this filing. 18 19 Dated: February 26, 2014 20 21 /s/ R. James Slaughter R. James Slaughter 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE No. C 13-3405 SI 1 PROPOSED ORDER 2 3 4 PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 5 1. The Further Case Management Conference currently set for March 7, 2014, is 6 7 hereby vacated; and 8 2. 9 The Further Case Management Conference shall be reset for April 25, 2014 at 3:00 p.m. 10 11 2/28/14 Dated: _______________ _______________________________ Hon. Susan Illston U.S. District Court Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE No. C 13-3405 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?