Caro v. The Members of Congress et al

Filing 4

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/03/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

RUDY CARO,
Plaintiff,

Case No. 13-3416 WHO (PR)

10

v.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

THE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15
16

Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s order to (1) file a complete

17

application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), or (2) pay the full filing fee of $350.00.

18

Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to respond to the

19

Court’s order, and for failure to prosecute, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Because this

20

dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any such motion

21

must contain (1) a complete IFP application, or (2) the full filing fee of $350.00. His

22

motion for an extension of time (Docket No. 3) is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter

23

judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 3, 2013
_________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge