Hansel et al v. Tracfone Wireless, Inc. et al

Filing 88

Joint Stipulation and Order Regarding Modified Case Schedule Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(B), 6-2, and 7-12. (#106 in 3:14-cv-01347-EMC) (#87 in 3:13-cv-03440-EMC) (#53 in 3:13-cv-05296-EMC) (#51 in 3:13-cv-05295-EMC) Replies due by 10/29/2014. O pposition due by 10/8/2014. Motion for Preliminary Approval Hearing set for 11/13/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/26/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2014) Modified on 8/26/2014 (cl, COURT STAFF).

1

Counsel Listed on Signature Page

2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

5
6

DAVID HANSELL, EDWARD TOOLEY,
and CHRISTOPHER VALDEZ, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated

7
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10

TRACFONE WIRELESS, INC., d.b.a.
STRAIGHT TALK WIRELESS, and
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

Case No.: 13-cv-3440-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
MODIFIED CASE SCHEDULE
PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULES 6-1(B),
6-2, AND 7-12

11
Defendants.
12
13
14

MARTIN BLAQMOOR, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

15
16
17

Case No. 13-cv-05295-EMC

Plaintiff,
v.
TRACFONE WIRELESS, INC.

18

Defendant.

19
20
21

MONA GANDHI, MARISHA JOHNSTON,
and MARSHALL TIETJE, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Case No. 13-cv-05296-EMC

Plaintiffs,

22
23

v.

24

TRACFONE WIRELESS, INC.

25

Defendant.

26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFIED CASE SCHEDULE

1
2

JOHN BROWNING, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated,

Case No. 14-cv-01347-EMC

Plaintiff,

3
4

v.

5

TRACFONE WIRELESS, INC. d/b/a
STRAIGHT TALK WIRELESS, NET10
WIRELESS, SIMPLE MOBILE and
TELCEL AMERICA and WAL-MART
STORES, INC.,

6
7
8

Defendant.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFIED CASE SCHEDULE

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s May 23, 2014 orders, the current schedule is as follows:

1
2

September 22, 2014

Completion of Confirmatory Discovery Re: Settlement

3

September 30, 2014

Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Approval

4

October 21, 2014

Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Approval

5

November 13, 2014

Hearing on Motion for Preliminary Approval/CMC

WHEREAS, the Hansell Plaintiffs have asked to take the deposition of Wal-Mart’s Mehrdad

6
7

Akbar as part of confirmatory discovery.
WHEREAS, Mr. Akbar’s next available date for a full-day deposition is September 30, 2014

8
9

and the parties are also available on this date.
WHEREAS, September 30, 2014 is after the discovery cut-off and the same day as the

10
11

Hansell Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Approval is due.
WHEREAS, the Court has previously ordered the following time modifications:

12
13

Hansell Dkt. 27, 28: Extending time to file answer

14

Hansell Dkt. 61, Blaqmoor Dkt. 29, Gandhi Dkt. 29: Rescheduling CMC

15

Blaqmoor Dkt. 16, Gandhi Dkt. 16: Modifying schedule on arbitration motion

16

Hansell Dkt. 72, Blaqmoor Dkt. 38, Gandhi Dkt. 50: Rescheduling hearing on

17

motion to stay.
WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate to the following modified schedule, pushing back the

18
19

discovery cut-off and each briefing deadline by eight days, to allow the Hansell Plaintiffs to take Mr.

20

Akbar’s deposition prior to the close of discovery and the filing of their Opposition to the Motion for

21

Preliminary Approval:
September 30, 2014

22
23

October 8, 2014

24

October 29, 2014

25

November 13, 2014, 1:30 p.m. (or as soon
thereafter as may be convenient to the Court)

26
27

Completion of Confirmatory Discovery
Re: Settlement
Opposition to Motion for Preliminary
Approval
Reply in Support of Motion for
Preliminary Approval
Hearing on Motion for Preliminary
Approval/CMC 1

1

The parties remain prepared to proceed on November 13, 2014 for the hearing on the motion for
preliminary approval. However, the parties recognize that entry of this modified schedule would

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFIED CASE SCHEDULE

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2

DATED:

August 20, 2014

Respectfully submitted,
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

3

By: /s/ Joel S. Feldman

4

Joel S. Feldman (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Lisa E. Schwartz (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
One South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603

5
6
7
8

Ryan M. Sandrock (SBN 251781)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94104

9
10
11

Steven J. Brodie (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Aaron S. Weiss (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
CARLTON FIELDS, P.A.
Miami Tower
100SE Second Street, Suite 4200
Miami, FL 33131-2119

12
13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendants

17
18

DATED:

August 20, 2014

By: /s/ Michael W. Sobol
Michael W. Sobol (State Bar No. 194857)
Roger N. Heller (State Bar No. 215348)
Nicole D. Sugnet (State Bar No. 246255)
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

19
20
21
22
23
24

Attorneys for the Hansell, Blaqmoor, and
Gandhi Plaintiffs

25
26
27

allow the Court eight fewer days than previously scheduled between the filing of the reply brief and
the hearing date, and that, should the stipulation be entered, the Court may wish to move the hearing
date back by a short period of time.

28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFIED CASE SCHEDULE

1

DATED:

August 20, 2014

By: /s/ Clayeo C. Arnold

2

Clayeo C. Arnold (State Bar No. 65070)
Christine M. Doyle (State Bar No. 106865)
Clayeo C. Arnold
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
865 Howe Avenue
Sacramento, California 95825
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7

J. Andrew Meyer (admitted pro hac vice)
John A. Yanchunis (admitted pro hac vice)
Rachel Soffin (admitted pro hac vice)
MORGAN & MORGAN
COMPLEX LITIGATION GROUP
201 North Franklin Street, 7th Floor
Tampa, Florida 33602
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for the Browning Plaintiffs

15
16
17
18

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing
document. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that the signatory has
concurred in this filing.

19
20
21

Dated:

August 20, 2014

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
By:

/s/ Ryan M. Sandrock

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFIED CASE SCHEDULE

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3
4
5

8/26/14
DATED: _________________________
____________________________________
HON. EDWARD M. CHEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFIED CASE SCHEDULE