Jensen v. Colvin
Filing
10
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO INFORM COURT WHETHER THEY CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES. The parties are directedto advise the Court, no later than November 12, 2013, as to whether they consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 31, 2013. (Attachment: # 1 Form)(mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2013)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
ANNETTE JENSEN,
No. C-13-3446 MMC
Plaintiff,
9
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO
INFORM COURT WHETHER THEY
CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FOR ALL PURPOSES
v.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
11
Defendant
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
/
In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to
reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final
judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b).
Accordingly, the parties are hereby DIRECTED to advise the Court, no later than
November 12, 2013, as to whether they consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all
further proceedings in the instant action.1 For the parties’ convenience, a consent form is
attached hereto; forms are also available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms”
section. The parties are further advised that they may jointly request assignment to a
specific magistrate judge.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: October 31, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
1
Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the Court in their Joint
Case Management Statement filed in connection with a case management conference.
Because the instant action involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case
management conference has not been scheduled.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?