Frlekin et al v. Apple Inc.

Filing 111

ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS ON MOTION TO CERTIFY, MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE, MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL, AND MOTION TO APPROVE DISCOVERY REQUEST. Signed by Judge Alsup on 1/9/2014. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 AMANDA FRLEKIN, et al. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 Plaintiffs, No. C 13-03451 WHA Defendant. ORDER RE MOTION TO CERTIFY, MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE, MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL, AND MOTION TO APPROVE DISCOVERY REQUEST v. APPLE, INC., 14 / 15 16 17 TAYLOR KALIN, Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 v. APPLE, INC., Defendant. / 22 23 There are several pending matters currently scheduled to be heard in the near future. 24 First, plaintiffs in the Frlekin action move for conditional certification of a FLSA collective 25 action. Second, defendant Apple, Inc., moves to consolidate the Frlekin action with the Kalin 26 action. Third, plaintiffs in both actions filed statements of non-opposition to defendant’s motion 27 to consolidate, and request that two law firms, the law firm of Louis Ginsberg and Mclaughlin 28 and Stern, be appointed as interim co-lead counsel for the proposed consolidated action. Fourth, defendant moves for a discovery order seeking approval of the parties’ stipulation regarding 1 depositions of certain Apple employees. These motions are currently scheduled to be heard on 2 different days. 3 In the interests of judicial efficiency, the motions will be continued to FEBRUARY 20, 4 2014, AT 8:00 A.M. All of the motions currently filed will be heard on this date. Counsel for all 5 parties in both actions must appear at this hearing. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: January 9, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?