Frlekin et al v. Apple Inc.
Filing
111
ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS ON MOTION TO CERTIFY, MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE, MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL, AND MOTION TO APPROVE DISCOVERY REQUEST. Signed by Judge Alsup on 1/9/2014. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
AMANDA FRLEKIN, et al.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
Plaintiffs,
No. C 13-03451 WHA
Defendant.
ORDER RE MOTION TO
CERTIFY, MOTION TO
CONSOLIDATE, MOTION TO
APPOINT COUNSEL, AND
MOTION TO APPROVE
DISCOVERY REQUEST
v.
APPLE, INC.,
14
/
15
16
17
TAYLOR KALIN,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
v.
APPLE, INC.,
Defendant.
/
22
23
There are several pending matters currently scheduled to be heard in the near future.
24
First, plaintiffs in the Frlekin action move for conditional certification of a FLSA collective
25
action. Second, defendant Apple, Inc., moves to consolidate the Frlekin action with the Kalin
26
action. Third, plaintiffs in both actions filed statements of non-opposition to defendant’s motion
27
to consolidate, and request that two law firms, the law firm of Louis Ginsberg and Mclaughlin
28
and Stern, be appointed as interim co-lead counsel for the proposed consolidated action. Fourth,
defendant moves for a discovery order seeking approval of the parties’ stipulation regarding
1
depositions of certain Apple employees. These motions are currently scheduled to be heard on
2
different days.
3
In the interests of judicial efficiency, the motions will be continued to FEBRUARY 20,
4
2014, AT 8:00 A.M. All of the motions currently filed will be heard on this date. Counsel for all
5
parties in both actions must appear at this hearing.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: January 9, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?