Frlekin et al v. Apple Inc.

Filing 209

ORDER LIFTING STAY AND REQUEST FOR BRIEFING. Brief due by 12/15/2014 at noon. Joint Response due by 12/22/2014 at noon. Show Cause by 12/23/2014 at noon. Reply due by 12/29/2014 at noon. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 9, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2014) Modified on 12/9/2014 (whalc1, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 AMANDA FRLEKIN, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 6 7 8 No. C 13-03451 WHA No. C 13-04727 WHA Plaintiffs, v. APPLE, INC., 9 ORDER LIFTING STAY AND REQUEST FOR BRIEFING Defendant. / 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 TAYLOR KALIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiffs, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant. / 16 17 A May 2014 order stayed a portion of Frlekin and Kalin pending Integrity Staffing 18 Solutions, Inc. v. Busk, 574 U.S. — (Dec. 9, 2014). Now that Busk has been decided, the stay is 19 hereby LIFTED. All deadlines in the second case management scheduling order remain in place 20 (Dkt. No. 198). As stated before, serial class certification motions will not be allowed. Plaintiffs 21 must put forth their best case by the deadline. 22 By DECEMBER 15 AT NOON, defendant shall file a brief (not to exceed eight pages) 23 regarding the effect of Busk herein. By DECEMBER 22 AT NOON, plaintiffs in Frlekin and Kalin 24 shall file one joint response (not to exceed twelve pages). By DECEMBER 29 AT NOON, 25 defendant shall file a reply (not to exceed three pages). The parties have until DECEMBER 23 AT 26 NOON to file a joint statement (not to exceed five pages) showing cause why the above-captioned 27 actions should not be consolidated. 28 Dated: December 9, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?