World Surveillance Group Inc v. La Jolla Cove Investors, Inc.

Filing 19

STIPULATION REGARDING UPCOMING EX PARTE MOTION HEARING AND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT re 18 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Motion hearing shall be continued to January 8, 2014 at 2:00 pm; La Jolla's Opposition will be due twenty-one (2 1) days prior to the hearing date; WSGI's Reply will be due fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing date; the due date for La Jolla's response to WSGI's Complaint, by answer or motion, shall be extended until January 22, 2014. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/04/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 4 Craig S. Miller (State Bar No. No. 139682) William S. Weisberg (State Bar No. 146284) WEISBERG & MILLER 654 Sacramento Street, Third Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 296-7070 Facsimile: (415) 296-7060 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 2 3 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LAW OFFICES OF WEISBERG & MILLER 654 SACRAMENTO STREET  THIRD FLOOR  SAN FRANCISCO  CA 94111 PHONE 4152967070 FAX 4152967060 10 11 12 WORLD SURVEILLANCE GROUP, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LA JOLLA COVE INVESTORS, INC., a California corporation, Case No. 3:13-cv-03455 (WHO) STIPULATION REGARDING UPCOMING EX PARTE MOTION HEARING AND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER Current Hearing Date: December 4, 2013 Time: 2:00 p.m. Floor/Court: 17, Ct. Rm. 2 DOES 1-30, Defendants. Plaintiff World Surveillance Group, Inc. (“WSGI”) and Defendant La Jolla Cove Investors, Inc. (“La Jolla”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby file the following stipulation regarding the upcoming December 4, 2013 hearing of Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Regarding Preliminary Injunction (“Motion”) and the time for La Jolla to respond to WSGI’s Complaint: WHEREAS WSGI and La Jolla participated in private mediation of this matter with the Honorable Edward Infante on September 17, 2013; WHEREAS WSGI and La Jolla remain engaged in settlement discussions following the mediation session; 28 Page 1 of 4 STIPULATION RE : HEARING AND RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT Case No. 3 :13-CV-03455 (WHO) 1 WHEREAS both WSGI and La Jolla have agreed that, in light of the ongoing settlement 2 discussions, the hearing and briefing on the schedule Motion and La Jolla’s response to WSGI’s 3 Complaint should be further continued to allow those settlement discussions to keep going; 4 5 6 7 8 9 LAW OFFICES OF WEISBERG & MILLER 654 SACRAMENTO STREET  THIRD FLOOR  SAN FRANCISCO  CA 94111 PHONE 4152967070 FAX 4152967060 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 WHEREAS counsel for WSGI has confirmed the availability of the Court for a January 8, 2014 hearing at 2:00 pm. NOW, THEREFORE, WSGI and La Jolla stipulate to the following: 1. That the hearing of the Motion currently scheduled for December 4, 2013 at 2:00 pm, shall be continued to January 8, 2014 at 2:00 pm; 2. That La Jolla’s Opposition to WSGI’s Motion will be due twenty-one (21) days prior to the January 8, 2014 hearing date; 3. That WSGI’s Reply to La Jolla’s Opposition will be due fourteen (14) days prior to the January 8, 2014 hearing date; 4. That the due date for La Jolla’s response to WSGI’s Complaint, by answer or motion, shall be extended until January 22, 2014. IT IS SO STIPULATED. The parties hereby request that the Court affirm this stipulation by signing it pursuant to Local Rule 7-12. WEISBERG & MILLER Dated: October 31, 2013 By: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 __/s/ Craig S. Miller_____________ Craig S. Miller, Attorneys for WSGI DLA PIPER LLP (US) Dated: October 31, 2013 By: __/s/ Roy K. McDonald__________ Roy K. McDonald, Attorneys for La Jolla I, Craig S. Miller, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION REGARDING UPCOMING EX PARTE MOTION HEARING AND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) hereby attest that Roy K. McDonald has given his concurrence as to the filing of this pleading. 28 Page 2 of 4 STIPULATION RE : HEARING AND RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT Case No. 3 :13-CV-03455 (WHO) 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 2 3 4 November 4 Dated: _______________________, 2013 __________________________________ The Hon. District Judge William H. Orrick 5 6 7 8 9 LAW OFFICES OF WEISBERG & MILLER 654 SACRAMENTO STREET  THIRD FLOOR  SAN FRANCISCO  CA 94111 PHONE 4152967070 FAX 4152967060 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 4 STIPULATION RE : HEARING AND RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT Case No. 3 :13-CV-03455 (WHO)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?