Leveraged Hawk, Inc. v. Global Hawk, Ltd. et al

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 26, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/26/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (rbe, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 LEVERAGED HAWK, INC., D/B/A GERTI MUHO CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, Plaintiff, 12 GLOBAL HAWK, LTD., et al., Defendants. 15 / 16 17 18 19 20 Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore’s Report and Recommendation, filed October 25, 2013, by which Magistrate Judge Westmore recommends the Court dismiss the above-titled action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. 21 22 Having reviewed the matter de novo, the Court, for the reasons expressed in the Report and Recommendation, hereby ADOPTS the Recommendation in its entirety. 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. 13 14 No. C 13-3469 MMC The Court further finds plaintiff’s complaint is subject to dismissal without prejudice for the additional reason that plaintiff has failed to indicate a current address “within 60 days of . . . a written communication” by the Court having been “returned to the Court as not deliverable.” See Civil L.R. 3-11(b). // 1 Accordingly, the above-titled action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: November 26, 2013 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?