Tripp et al v. Crossmark, Inc. et al

Filing 34

ORDER TO STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 33 STIPULATION. Case Management Conference continued to 8/19/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 8/12/2014. (CMC set for 7/17/2014 VACATED.) Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/09/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2014)

1
2
3
4

Lara C. de Leon, CA Bar No. 270252
[e-mail]
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Park Tower, Suite 1500
695 Town Center Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Telephone:
714.800.7900
Facsimile:
714.754.1298

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Carolyn B. Hall, CA Bar No. 212311
[e-mail]
Timothy L. Reed, CA Bar No. 258034
[e-mail]
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.442.4810
Facsimile:
415.442.4870
Attorneys for Defendants
CROSSMARK, INC. and CHI MANAGEMENT GROUP, LP

12
13
14
15
16

Eric A. Grover, CA Bar No. 136080
[e-mail]
Robert W. Spencer, CA Bar No. 238491
[e-mail]
KELLER GROVER LLP
1965 Marker Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
Telephone:
415.543.1305
Facsimile:
415.543.7861

17
18

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CLAY TRIPP AND KAREN SOLBERG

19
20

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

21
22
23

CLAY TRIPP and KAREN SOLBERG, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated, and all aggrieved employees

24
25
26

Plaintiff,

Case No. 3:13-cv-03480-WHO
ORDER TO STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

vs.
CROSSMARK, INC., CHI MANAGEMENT
GROUP, LP, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive

27

Action Filed:
Action Removed:

June 4, 2013
July 26, 2013

Defendant.
28
Case No. 3:13-cv-03480-WHO
ORDER TO STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

For good cause appearing the Court orders that:
1. The Case Management Conference is continued until August 19, 2014 at 2 p.m. A
Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed by August 12, 2014 that addresses,
among other things, whether the mediation was successful, whether the parties plan to
consolidate this action with the one pending in the Central District of California or to
otherwise transfer the case to the Central District of California, and, unless the case has
settled, what firm case scheduling dates the parties propose in the event the case
remains in this Court.

9
10
11

DATED: June 9, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 3:13-cv-03480-WHO
ORDER TO STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE