Rahman v. Mott's LLP et al
ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 122 .(Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/12/2018)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 13-cv-03482-SI
ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE;
RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
Re: Dkt. No. 122
United States District Court
Northern District of California
On December 1, 2017, plaintiff Mohammed Rahman filed a motion for reconsideration
with this Court. Dkt. No. 122. Plaintiff’s motion is based on the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in
Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation, 873 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2017) (“Davidson”). The
parties have informed the Court that a petition for rehearing en banc in Davidson was filed on
November 3, 2017. The Ninth Circuit has yet to resolve the pending petition.
The Court finds that in the interests of judicial economy, the Court will consider the
questions presented by plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration after the Ninth Circuit resolves the en
banc petition. 1 Accordingly, the Court VACATES the January 17, 2018, hearing date and denies
plaintiff’s motion without prejudice. Dkt. No. 122. The parties are instructed to contact the Court
once a decision on the petition has been made. Once the petition has been denied, or has been
granted and the case decided, the motion will be rescheduled.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 12, 2017
United States District Judge
Plaintiff opposes the request to delay the hearing pending the Ninth Circuit’s decision.
Dkt. No. 124.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?