Rahman v. Mott's LLP et al
Filing
63
ORDER, Motions terminated: 62 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 45 Case Management Conference - Initial, Set Hearings,, STIPULATION TO EXTEND CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE BY TWO WEEKS TO ALLOW COMPLETION OF PRE-CERITIFICAT ION DISCOVERY filed by Mohammed Rahman. Motion Hearing re: class certification set for 9/19/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Susan Illston.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 6/26/14. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
15
MOHAMMED RAHMAN, individually,
and on behalf of other members of the
general public similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
20
vs.
Case No. 3:13-cv-03482-SI
CLASS ACTION
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
MOTT’S L.L.P. and DOES 1 through 10,
Defendants.
Judge:
Hon. Susan Illston
Notice of Removal: July 26, 2013
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO 3:13-CV-03482-SI
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE
1
2
3
Having considered the parties’ joint stipulation, and good cause being found, the Court
Orders:
1.
Good Cause appearing therefore, the class certification briefing schedule is
4
vacated and the new class certification briefing schedule is as follows: Plaintiff’s Motion for
5
Class Certification is due: 8/1/14, Opposition 8/22/14, Reply 9/5/14;
6
7
8
9
2.
The new hearing date for the motion is: 9/19/14 @ 9:00 a.m.
__________________.
3.
This is without prejudice to the parties seeking a further extension of the
briefing schedule upon a showing of good cause.
10
11
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 25, 2014
16
17
18
Hon. Susan Illston
Judge of the U.S. District Court
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 1
CASE NO 3:13-CV-03482-S
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?