Rahman v. Mott's LLP et al

Filing 63

ORDER, Motions terminated: 62 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 45 Case Management Conference - Initial, Set Hearings,, STIPULATION TO EXTEND CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE BY TWO WEEKS TO ALLOW COMPLETION OF PRE-CERITIFICAT ION DISCOVERY filed by Mohammed Rahman. Motion Hearing re: class certification set for 9/19/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Susan Illston.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 6/26/14. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 MOHAMMED RAHMAN, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, Plaintiff, 16 17   18 19 20 vs. Case No. 3:13-cv-03482-SI CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE MOTT’S L.L.P. and DOES 1 through 10, Defendants. Judge: Hon. Susan Illston Notice of Removal: July 26, 2013 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO 3:13-CV-03482-SI [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 2 3 Having considered the parties’ joint stipulation, and good cause being found, the Court Orders: 1. Good Cause appearing therefore, the class certification briefing schedule is 4 vacated and the new class certification briefing schedule is as follows: Plaintiff’s Motion for 5 Class Certification is due: 8/1/14, Opposition 8/22/14, Reply 9/5/14; 6 7 8 9 2. The new hearing date for the motion is: 9/19/14 @ 9:00 a.m. __________________. 3. This is without prejudice to the parties seeking a further extension of the briefing schedule upon a showing of good cause. 10 11 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 25, 2014 16 17   18 Hon. Susan Illston Judge of the U.S. District Court 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 1 CASE NO 3:13-CV-03482-S [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?