Harris v. Kahja

Filing 20

ORDER OF SERVICE. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 2/4/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
DAVID D. HARRIS,
Plaintiff,

12

C 13-3530 WHA (PR)

ORDER OF SERVICE

vs.

13
14

Nos.

DR. A. KAHJA,
Defendant

15

/

16
17

INTRODUCTION
18
Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, filed this civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. 1983. He was
19
granted leave to file an amended complaint, which he has done. For the reasons discussed
20
below, the amended complaint is ordered served upon defendant.
21
ANALYSIS
22
A.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

23
Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek
24
redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.
25
1915A(a). In its review the court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims
26
which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek
27
monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro
28
se pleadings must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699

1

(9th Cir. 1990).

2

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires only "a short and plain statement of the

3

claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." "Specific facts are not necessary; the

4

statement need only '"give the defendant fair notice of what the . . . . claim is and the grounds

5

upon which it rests."'" Erickson v. Pardus, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 2200 (2007) (citations omitted).

6

Although in order to state a claim a complaint “does not need detailed factual allegations, . . . a

7

plaintiff's obligation to provide the 'grounds of his 'entitle[ment] to relief' requires more than

8

labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not

9

do. . . . Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative
level." Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 127 S. Ct. 1955, 1964-65 (2007) (citations omitted). A

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

complaint must proffer "enough facts to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face." Id.

12

at 1974.

13

To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements:

14

(1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2)

15

that the alleged deprivation was committed by a person acting under the color of state law.

16

West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).

17

B.

18

LEGAL CLAIMS
Plaintiff, an inmate at Salinas Valley State Prison, alleges that defendant Dr. Kahja, a

19

psychiatrist at plaintiff’s prison, ordered plaintiff to be put on “suicide watch” in a “stripped

20

cell.” The cell had no toilet or running water, causing plaintiff to hold his bodily functions for

21

72 hours and to be unable to drink at his leisure. Dr. Kahja caused plaintiff to remain there for

22

seven days. When liberally construed, such allegations could a cognizable claim that Dr. Khaja

23

violated plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment rights.

24

CONCLUSION

25

For the reasons set out above, it is hereby ordered as follows:

26

1. The clerk shall issue summons and the United States Marshal shall serve, without

27

prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint with all attachments thereto, and a copy of this

28

order upon defendant Dr. Kahja at Salinas Valley State Prison. A courtesy copy of the
2

1

complaint with attachments and this order shall also be mailed to the California Attorney

2

General’s Office.

3
4
5

2. Defendant shall file an answer in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
3. In order to expedite the resolution of this case:

6

a. No later than 91 days from the date this order is filed, defendant shall file a

7

motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. If defendant is of the opinion that

8

this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, he shall so inform the court prior to the date

9

the summary judgment motion is due. All papers filed with the court shall be promptly served

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

on the plaintiff.
b. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion, if any, shall be filed with the

12

court and served upon defendant no later than 28 days from the date of service of the motion.

13

Plaintiff must read the attached page headed “NOTICE -- WARNING,” which is provided to

14

him pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 953-954 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), and

15

Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988).

16

If defendant files an unenumerated motion to dismiss claiming that plaintiff failed to

17

exhaust his available administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), plaintiff

18

should take note of the attached page headed “NOTICE -- WARNING (EXHAUSTION),”

19

which is provided to him as required by Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 n. 4 (9th Cir.),

20

cert. denied, Alameida v. Wyatt, 124 S.Ct 50 (2003).

21
22
23
24
25

c. Defendant shall file a reply brief no later than 14 days after the date of
service of the opposition.
d. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due.
No hearing will be held on the motion unless the court so orders at a later date.
e. Along with his motion, defendant shall proof that they served plaintiff the

26

applicable warning(s) required by Woods v. Carey, No. 09-15548, slip op. 7871 (9th Cir. July 6,

27

2012) and/or Stratton v. Buck, No. 10-35656, slip op. 11477 (9th Cir. Sept. 19, 2012), at the

28

same time they served him with their motion. Failure to do so will result in the summary
3

1
2

dismissal of their motion without prejudice.
4. All communications by the plaintiff with the court must be served on defendant, or

3

defendant’s counsel once counsel has been designated, by mailing a true copy of the document

4

to defendant or defendant’s counsel.

5

5. Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

6

No further court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) or Local Rule 16-1 is

7

required before the parties may conduct discovery.

8

7. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the court

9

informed of any change of address and must comply with the court's orders in a timely fashion.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
Dated: February
14

4

, 2014.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

NOTICE -- WARNING (SUMMARY JUDGMENT)
If defendants move for summary judgment, they are seeking to have your case
dismissed. A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure will, if granted, end your case.
Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for summary judgment.
Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is no genuine issue of material
fact--that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result of your case,
the party who asked for summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which
will end your case. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary judgment that is
properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot simply rely on what
your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in declarations, depositions,
answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as provided in Rule 56(e), that
contradict the facts shown in the defendant's declarations and documents and show that there is
a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit your own evidence in opposition,
summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. If summary judgment is
granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial.

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16

NOTICE -- WARNING (EXHAUSTION)
If defendants file a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, they
are seeking to have your case dismissed. If the motion is granted it will end your case and there
will be no trial.
A motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is similar to a motion
for summary judgment in that the court will consider materials beyond the pleadings. You have
the right to present any evidence you may have which tends to show that you did exhaust your
administrative remedies. Such evidence may be in the form of declarations (statements signed
under penalty of perjury) or authenticated documents, that is, documents accompanied by a
declaration showing where they came from and why they are authentic, or other sworn papers,
such as answers to interrogatories or depositions. In considering a motion to dismiss for failure
to exhaust administrative remedies, the court can decided disputed factual matters with regard
to the exhaustion question. Because the court can resolve factual disputes, unlike a summary
judgment opposition, it is not enough to merely show a genuine issue of material fact in
opposition to the motion to dismiss.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5