Brado v. Vocera Communications Inc et al

Filing 118

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 117 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 111 MOTION to Dismiss Vocera Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Consolidated Complaint and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, 99 Order on Stipulation Ext filed by Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Baltimore County Employees' Retirement System, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 117 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 111 MOTION to Dismiss Vocera D efendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Consolidated Complaint and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, 99 Order on Stipulation Ext. Responses due by 11/26/2014. Replies due by 12/17/2014.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/7/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2014)

1
2
3
4

SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (CSB No. 213113)
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
Post Montgomery Center
One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs
6
7
8
9

JONATHAN GARDNER (pro hac vice)
LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
140 Broadway
New York, New York 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

10
11

Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs Baltimore County
Employees’ Retirement System and
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System

12
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18

20

IN RE VOCERA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
SECURITIES LITIGATION
______________________________________

21

This Document Relates To:

19

22

All Actions.

Case No. 3:13-cv-03567 EMC
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS

23
24
25
26
27

Judge: The Hon. Edward M. Chen
DATE: January 15, 2015
TIME: 1:30 p.m.
DEPT: 5, 17th Floor
Filed: August 1, 2013

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY
BRIEFS

1

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s Order dated August 15, 2014, (ECF No. 99), Lead

2

Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Complaint on September 19, 2014 (ECF No. 104) and Defendants

3

filed their motions to dismiss on November 3, 2014 (ECF No. 110-11);

4

WHEREAS, oral argument on Defendants’ motions has been noticed for January 15,

5

2015, the first date available for all parties and the Court, and the Case Management Conference

6

has been rescheduled for the same day in accordance with the Court’s August 15, 2014 Order,

7

(ECF Nos. 99; 116);

8
9
10

WHEREAS, the current deadline for Lead Plaintiffs to file opposition briefs to
Defendants’ motions to dismiss is November 17, 2014, fourteen (14) days after the filing of the
motions to dismiss;

11

WHEREAS, the current deadline for Defendants to file reply briefs in further support of

12

the motions to dismiss is November 24, 2014, seven (7) days after the filing of the opposition to

13

the motions to dismiss;

14

WHEREAS, in light of the noticed hearing date, to accommodate conflicts in the work

15

and personal schedules of counsel for the parties, and to permit sufficient time to

16

comprehensively address the issues presented in Defendants’ motions to dismiss, the parties have

17

agreed that the briefing schedule be amended as follows:

18
19
20
21

1.

Lead Plaintiffs will file opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss on

November 26, 2014, and
2.

Defendants will file replies in further support of their motions to dismiss on

December 17, 2014.

22

IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED that the deadline for Lead Plaintiffs to file

23

opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss is extended from November 17, 2014 to November

24

26, 2014, and the deadline for Defendants to file replies is extended from November 24, 2014 to

25

December 17, 2014.

26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY
BRIEFS

1

Dated: November 6, 2014

2

By: /s/ Shawn A. Williams
Shawn A. Williams, Esq.

3

Post Montgomery Center
One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

4
5
6

Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs

7
8

Dated: November 6, 2014

9

140 Broadway
New York, New York 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

11
12
13

Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs Baltimore County
Employees’ Retirement System and Arkansas
Teacher Retirement System

14

16
17
18
19

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
By: /s/ Jonathan Gardner
Jonathan Gardner, Esq.

10

15

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP

Dated: November 6, 2014

FENWICK & WEST LLP
By: /s/ Jennifer C. Bretan
Jennifer C. Bretan, Esq.
555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

20
21
22

Attorneys for Vocera Communications, Inc., Robert J.
Zollars, Brent D. Lang, Martin J. Silver, William R.
Zerella, Brian D. Ascher, John B. Grotting, Jeffrey H.
Hillebrand, Howard E. Janzen, John N. McMullen,
Hany M. Nada, and Donald F. Wood

23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY
BRIEFS

1

Dated: November 6, 2014

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

2

By: /s/ Simona G. Strauss
Simona G. Strauss, Esq.

3

2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

4
5
6

Attorneys for Defendants J.P. Morgan Securities LLC,
Piper Jaffray & Co., Robert W. Baird & Co.
Incorporated, William Blair & Company, L.L.C., Wells
Fargo Securities, LLC, and Leerink Partners LLC

7
8
9
10

Pursuant to Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), all signatories concur in filing this stipulation.

11 Dated: November 6, 2014

By: /s/ Jonathan Gardner
Jonathan Gardner

12
13

***

14

[PROPOSED] ORDER

NO

19

Hon. Edward M. Chen
United States District Court Judge
en
d M. Ch
e Edwar
Judg

RT

20

I

ER

H

21
22

ERED

R NIA

18

ORD
T IS SO

FO

November 7, 2014

LI

Dated:

A

17

UNIT
ED

16

RT
U
O

S DISTRICT
TE
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. A
C
T

S

15

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY
BRIEFS