Brado v. Vocera Communications Inc et al

Filing 162

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 161 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING filed by William R. Zerella, Vocera Communications Inc, Robert J. Zollars, Brent D. Lang Status Report due by 10/29/2015. Class Certification Motion Hearing reset for 11/5/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Status Conference reset for 11/5/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/25/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SUSAN S. MUCK (CSB No. 126930) smuck@fenwick.com JENNIFER C. BRETAN (CSB No. 233475) jbretan@fenwick.com MARIE C. BAFUS (CSB No. 258417) mbafus@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415.875.2300 Facsimile: 415.281.1350 Attorneys Defendants Vocera Communications, Inc., Robert J. Zollars, Brent D. Lang and William R. Zerella 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 15 IN RE VOCERA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 3:13-cv-03567 EMC CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: All Actions. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING 16 Judge: The Honorable Edward M. Chen 17 Date Action Filed: August 1, 2013 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING MASTER FILE NO. 3:13-cv--03567 EMC 1 This stipulation is entered into by and among Lead Plaintiffs Baltimore County 2 Employees’ Retirement System and Arkansas Teacher Retirement System (collectively, “Lead 3 Plaintiffs”) and defendants Vocera Communications, Inc., Robert J. Zollars, Brent D. Lang and 4 William R. Zerella (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their respective attorneys of 5 record: 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, the above-captioned consolidated action is a proposed class action alleging violations of the federal securities laws against Defendants; WHEREAS, on April 3, 2015, this Court issued a Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial (the “Order”) setting certain deadlines in the action [Dkt. No. 152]; anticipated motion for class certification: (i) Lead Plaintiffs’ class certification motion due on or 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO WHEREAS, the Order set the following deadlines associated with Lead Plaintiffs’ 11 F ENWICK & W EST LLP 10 before July 15, 2015; (ii) Defendants’ opposition to class certification motion due on or before 13 August 26, 2015; (iii) Lead Plaintiffs’ reply in support of class certification motion due on or 14 before September 23, 2015; and (iv) hearing on class certification motion set for October 15, 15 2015 at 1:30 p.m.; 16 WHEREAS, in order to accommodate the scheduling availability of Lead Plaintiffs’ 17 representatives for deposition, the parties have stipulated and agreed to a one week adjustment in 18 the schedule for certain deadlines associated with class certification as follows: 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (i) Defendants shall file their opposition to Lead Plaintiffs’ class certification motion on or before September 2, 2015; (ii) Lead Plaintiffs shall file their reply in support of class certification motion on or before September 30, 2015; WHEREAS, the deadline for Lead Plaintiffs to file the class certification motion and the date set for the hearing on the class certification motion shall not change; IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, that: (i) Defendants shall file their opposition to Lead Plaintiffs’ class certification motion on or before September 2, 2015; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING 1 MASTER FILE NO. 3:13-cv-03567 EMC 1 2 3 (ii) Lead Plaintiffs shall file their reply in support of class certification motion on or before September 30, 2015; (iii) The deadline for Lead Plaintiffs to file their class certification motion (July 15, 4 2015) and the date and time of the hearing shall remain October 15, 2015 at 1:30 p.m., or such 5 other date as the Court deems appropriate. 6 Dated: June 22, 2015 7 By: /s/ Marie C. Bafus Marie C. Bafus 8 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 9 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants Vocera Communications, Inc., Robert J. Zollars, Brent D. Lang and William R. Zerella ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 12 F ENWICK & W EST LLP FENWICK & WEST LLP 13 14 Dated: June 22, 2015 15 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP By: /s/ Shawn A. Williams Shawn A. Williams 16 19 Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 288-4545 Facsimile: (415) 288-4534 20 Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs 17 18 21 Dated: June 22, 2015 22 LABATON SUCHAROW LLP By: /s/ Jonathan Gardner Jonathan Gardner (pro hac vice) 23 140 Broadway New York, New York 10005 Telephone: (212) 907-0700 Facsimile: (212) 818-0477 24 25 26 Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs Baltimore County Employees’ Retirement System and Arkansas Teacher Retirement System 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING 2 MASTER FILE NO. 3:13-cv-03567 EMC Dated: June 22, 2015 By: /s/ Marie C. Bafus Marie C. Bafus 3 *** 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER 5 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The motion for class certification and status conference are reset for November 5, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. An updated joint status report shall be filed by October 29, 2015. 7 8 S UNIT ED Hon. Edward M. Chen United States District Court Judge ERED 11 13 O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO NO 14 RT 15 16 . Chen ward M udge Ed J ER H ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 12 F ENWICK & W EST LLP RT U O 10 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 9 June 25, 2015 Dated: FO 6 LI 2 Pursuant to Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), all signatories concur in filing this stipulation. A 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING 3 MASTER FILE NO. 3:13-cv-03567 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?