Brado v. Vocera Communications Inc et al

Filing 210

ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/29/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2016)

Download PDF
Case 3:13-cv-03567-EMC Document 201-2 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 2 2 3 4 5 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN &DOWDLLP SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (213113) Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) shawnw@rgrdlaw.com katerinap@rgrd law .com 6 Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs 7 8 9 10 11 LABATON SUCHAROW LLP JONATHAN GARDNER CAROL C. VILLEGAS 140 Broadway New York, New York 10005 Telephone: 212/907-0700 212/818-04 77 (fax) jgardner@ labaton.com cvillegas@ labaton.com 12 Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 IN RE VOCERA COMMUNICATIONS , INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION 18 This Document Relates to: 19 All Actions. 20 21 22 23 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MASTER FILE NO.3: 13-cv-03567 EMC ~ ] ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION Date: June 23 , 2016 Time: 1:30 p.m. Judge: The Hon. Edward M. Chen Dep' t: 5, 17th Floor ) _______________________________) 24 25 This matter having come before the Court on June 23 , 2016, on the motion ofLead 26 Plaintiffs for final approval of the proposed class action Settlement and approval of the proposed 27 Plan of Allocation for the net proceeds of the Settlement; the Court having considered all papers 28 filed and proceedings had herein and otherwise being fully informed; MASTER FILE NO . 3: 13-cv-03567 EMC (PROPOSED] ORDER A PPROVING P LAN OF ALLOCATION Case 3:13-cv-03567-EMC Document 201-2 Filed 05/19/16 Page 2 of 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 2 1. This Order incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation and 3 Agreement of Settlement, dated as of January 14, 2016 (the " Stipulation"), and all capitalized 4 terms used, but not defined herein, shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation. 5 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this application and all 6 matters relating thereto, including all members of the Settlement Class who have not timely and 7 validly requested exclusion . 8 9 3. Pursuant to and in compliance with Rule 23 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court hereby finds and concludes that due and adequate notice was directed to 10 persons and entities who are Settlement Class Members, advising them of the proposed Plan of ยท 11 Allocation and of their right to object thereto, and a full and fair opportunity was accorded to 12 persons and entities who are Settlement Class Members to be heard with respect to the Plan of 13 Allocation. 14 4. [There were no objections to the Plan of Allocation.] 15 5. The Court hereby finds and concludes that the Plan of Allocation for the 16 calculation of claims that is set forth in the Notice of Pendency of Class Action, Proposed 17 Settlement, and Motion for Attorneys ' Fees and Expenses (the "Notice") disseminated to class 18 members provides a fair and reasonable basis upon which to allocate the net settlement proceeds 19 among class members. 20 21 6. The Court hereby finds and concludes that the Plan of Allocation set forth in the Notice is, in all respects, fair and reasonable and the Court hereby approves the Plan of --------'------' 2016 Honorable Edward M . Chen UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MASTER FILE NO . 3:13-cv-03567 EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER A PPROVING P LAN OF ALLOCATI ON 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?