Brado v. Vocera Communications Inc et al
Filing
210
ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/29/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2016)
Case 3:13-cv-03567-EMC Document 201-2 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 2
2
3
4
5
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
&DOWDLLP
SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (213113)
Post Montgomery Center
One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415/288-4545
415/288-4534 (fax)
shawnw@rgrdlaw.com
katerinap@rgrd law .com
6
Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs
7
8
9
10
11
LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
JONATHAN GARDNER
CAROL C. VILLEGAS
140 Broadway
New York, New York 10005
Telephone: 212/907-0700
212/818-04 77 (fax)
jgardner@ labaton.com
cvillegas@ labaton.com
12
Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
IN RE VOCERA COMMUNICATIONS ,
INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION
18
This Document Relates to:
19
All Actions.
20
21
22
23
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
MASTER FILE NO.3: 13-cv-03567 EMC
~
] ORDER APPROVING
PLAN OF ALLOCATION
Date: June 23 , 2016
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Judge: The Hon. Edward M. Chen
Dep' t: 5, 17th Floor
)
_______________________________)
24
25
This matter having come before the Court on June 23 , 2016, on the motion ofLead
26
Plaintiffs for final approval of the proposed class action Settlement and approval of the proposed
27
Plan of Allocation for the net proceeds of the Settlement; the Court having considered all papers
28
filed and proceedings had herein and otherwise being fully informed;
MASTER FILE NO . 3: 13-cv-03567 EMC
(PROPOSED] ORDER A PPROVING P LAN OF ALLOCATION
Case 3:13-cv-03567-EMC Document 201-2 Filed 05/19/16 Page 2 of 2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:
2
1.
This Order incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation and
3
Agreement of Settlement, dated as of January 14, 2016 (the " Stipulation"), and all capitalized
4
terms used, but not defined herein, shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation.
5
2.
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this application and all
6
matters relating thereto, including all members of the Settlement Class who have not timely and
7
validly requested exclusion .
8
9
3.
Pursuant to and in compliance with Rule 23 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, this Court hereby finds and concludes that due and adequate notice was directed to
10
persons and entities who are Settlement Class Members, advising them of the proposed Plan of ยท
11
Allocation and of their right to object thereto, and a full and fair opportunity was accorded to
12
persons and entities who are Settlement Class Members to be heard with respect to the Plan of
13
Allocation.
14
4.
[There were no objections to the Plan of Allocation.]
15
5.
The Court hereby finds and concludes that the Plan of Allocation for the
16
calculation of claims that is set forth in the Notice of Pendency of Class Action, Proposed
17
Settlement, and Motion for Attorneys ' Fees and Expenses (the "Notice") disseminated to class
18
members provides a fair and reasonable basis upon which to allocate the net settlement proceeds
19
among class members.
20
21
6.
The Court hereby finds and concludes that the Plan of Allocation set forth in the
Notice is, in all respects, fair and reasonable and the Court hereby approves the Plan of
--------'------' 2016
Honorable Edward M . Chen
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
MASTER FILE NO . 3:13-cv-03567 EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER A PPROVING P LAN OF ALLOCATI ON
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?