Brado v. Vocera Communications Inc et al

Filing 38

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC re 36 by John B. Grotting, Martin J. Silver, Brian D. Ascher, William R. Zerella, Vocera Communications Inc, Robert J. Zollars, Jeffrey H. Hillebrand, Howard E. Janzen, Donald F. Wood, Hany M. Nada, John N. McMullen, Brent D. Lang Case Management Statement due by 1/16/2014. Case Management Conference set for 1/23/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/23/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI SCO F ENWICK & W ES T LLP 12 13 SUSAN S. MUCK (CSB NO. 126930) smuck@fenwick.com CATHERINE KEVANE (CSB NO. 215501) ckevane@fenwick.com JENNIFER BRETAN (CSB NO. 233475) jbretan@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 RONNIE SOLOMON (CSB NO. 284923) rsolomon@fenwick.com Silicon Valley Center, 801 California Street Mountain View, California 94041 Phone: 650.988.8500 Fax: 650.938.5200 Attorneys for Defendants Vocera Communications, Inc., Robert J. Zollars, Brent D. Lang, Martin J. Silver, William R. Zerella, Brian D. Ascher, John B. Grotting, Jeffrey H. Hillebrand, Howard E. Janzen, John N. McMullen, Hany M. Nada, and Donald F. Wood 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 MICHAEL BRADO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. VOCERA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ROBERT J. ZOLLARS, BRENT D. LANG, MARTIN J. SILVER, WILLIAM R. ZERELLA, BRIAN D. ASCHER, JOHN B. GROTTING, JEFFREY H. HILLEBRAND, HOWARD E. JANZEN, JOHN N. MCMULLEN, HANY M. NADA, DONALD F. WOOD, J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, PIPER JAFFRAY & CO., ROBERT W. BAIRD & CO. INCORPORATED, WILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY, L.L.C., WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC, and LEERINK SWANN LLC, Case No. CV 13-03567 EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES Judge: The Honorable Edward M. Chen Date Action Filed: August 1, 2013 Defendants. 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. CV 13-03567 EMC CASE NO. CV 13-03872 EMC 1 2 DALE DUNCAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No. CV 13-03872 EMC Judge: The Honorable Edward M. Chen 3 Plaintiff, 4 vs. Date Action Filed: August 21, 2013 5 6 7 8 9 10 VOCERA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ROBERT J. ZOLLARS, BRENT D. LANG, MARTIN J. SILVER, WILLIAM R. ZERELLA, BRIAN D. ASCHER, JOHN B. GROTTING, JEFFREY H. HILLEBRAND, HOWARD E. JANZEN, JOHN N. MCMULLEN, HANY M. NADA, DONALD F. WOOD, J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, PIPER JAFFRAY & CO., ROBERT W. BAIRD & CO. INCORPORATED, WILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY, L.L.C., WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC, and LEERINK SWANN LLC, 11 Defendants. ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI SCO F ENWICK & W ES T LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. CV 13-03567 EMC CASE NO. CV 13-03872 EMC 1 WHEREAS, the above-captioned actions, Brado v. Vocera Communications, Inc. et al., 2 Case No. CV-13-03567 EMC, filed on August 1, 2013 (“Brado”) and Duncan v. Vocera 3 Communications, Inc. et al., Case No. CV-13-03872 EMC, filed on August 21, 2013 (“Duncan”) 4 (together, the “Securities Actions”), are proposed class actions alleging violations of the federal 5 securities laws against Vocera Communications, Inc., (“Vocera” or the “Company”), certain 6 individual officers and directors of the Company, and certain investment banks that served as 7 underwriters in connection with the Company’s initial public offering, (collectively, 8 “Defendants”); and 9 WHEREAS, on August 1, 2013, this Court issued an Order Setting Initial Case 10 Management Conference And ADR Deadlines (Dkt. No. 2) in Brado, the first-filed action, setting 11 the following deadlines: ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI SCO F ENWICK & W ES T LLP 12 1. October 10, 2013 for the parties to comply with certain requirements under the 13 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Northern District of California Civil 14 Local Rules (“Local Rules” or “Civil L.R.”) and Alternative Dispute Resolution 15 (“ADR”) Local Rules regarding discovery, early settlement, and the ADR Multi- 16 Option Program; and 17 2. October 24, 2013 for the parties to file a Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial 18 disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file a Joint Case 19 Management Statement; and 20 3. October 31, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. for an initial case management conference; and 21 WHEREAS, on September 17, 2013, the Court issued an Order deeming the Securities 22 Actions “related cases” within the meaning of Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 23 (“Civil L.R.”) 3-12 and ordering that the case management deadlines in the reassigned case be 24 rescheduled (Dkts. 33, 34); 25 WHEREAS, the Securities Actions are subject to the requirements of the Private 26 Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub.L. No. 104-67, 109 Stat. 737 (1995) (the “Reform 27 Act”), which sets forth specialized procedures for the administration of securities class actions; 28 and STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 CASE NO. CV 13-03567 EMC CASE NO. CV 13-03872 EMC 1 2 WHEREAS, the Reform Act provides for the appointment of a lead plaintiff to act on behalf of the purported class following consolidation (15 U.S.C. §78u-4(a)(3)(B)(ii)); and 3 WHEREAS, on September 30, 2013, motions for consolidation and for appointment of 4 lead plaintiff in the consolidated action are expected to be filed (“Lead Plaintiff Motions”); and 5 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, the process for approval of lead counsel will follow the Court’s determination on lead plaintiff; and WHEREAS, thereafter, the parties expect the Court to set a schedule for a consolidated complaint to be filed; and WHEREAS, defendants anticipate filing motion(s) to dismiss in response to the 10 consolidated complaint and that the parties will submit a briefing schedule to the Court in 11 connection with any such motion(s); and ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI SCO F ENWICK & W ES T LLP 12 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Reform Act, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, 13 discovery in this action is stayed during the pendency of any motion to dismiss (15 U.S.C. § 78u- 14 4(b)(3)(B)); and 15 WHEREAS, counsel for the plaintiffs and defendants in the above-captioned actions 16 respectfully submit that good cause exists to vacate the existing October 31, 2013 initial case 17 management conference and associated ADR deadlines until such time as the Court has the 18 opportunity to rule on the appointment of lead plaintiff and approval of lead counsel. 19 20 21 IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, that: i. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-2, the Initial Case Management Conference scheduled 22 for October 31, 2013 be vacated, along with any associated deadlines under the 23 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules, to be rescheduled for a date that 24 is either 30 days after the filing of the consolidated complaint or 30 days after the 25 Court rules on defendants’ anticipated motion(s) to dismiss the consolidated 26 complaint, as the Court shall determine to be appropriate; and 27 ii. that all associated ADR Multi-Option Program deadlines likewise be deferred; and 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 2 CASE NO. CV 13-03567 EMC CASE NO. CV 13-03872 EMC 1 iii. that any case management conference and associated deadlines being rescheduled 2 by the Court in the recently related Duncan matter, Case No. CV-13-03872 EMC, 3 be similarly scheduled in light of the foregoing. 4 Dated: September 19, 2013 5 By: /s/ Jennifer C. Bretan Jennifer C. Bretan, Esq. 6 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 7 8 9 Attorneys for Vocera Communications, Inc., Robert J. Zollars, Brent D. Lang, Martin J. Silver, William R. Zerella, Brian D. Ascher, John B. Grotting, Jeffrey H. Hillebrand, Howard E. Janzen, John N. McMullen, Hany M. Nada, and Donald F. Wood 10 11 ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI SCO F ENWICK & W ES T LLP 12 Dated: September 19, 2013 13 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP By: /s/ Norman J. Blears Norman J. Blears, Esq. 14 525 University Avenue, 4th Floor Palo Alto, CA 94301 Phone: (650) 463-4001 Fax: (650) 463-4199 15 16 17 Attorneys for Defendants J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Piper Jaffray & Co., Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, William Blair & Company, L.L.C., Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, and Leerink Swann LLC 18 19 20 FENWICK & WEST LLP Dated: September 19, 2013 SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP By: /s/ Hal Cunningham Hal Cunningham, Esq. 21 22 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Phone: (310) 201-9150 Fax: (310) 201-9160 23 24 Attorneys for Plaintiff Michael Brado 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 3 CASE NO. CV 13-03567 EMC CASE NO. CV 13-03872 EMC Dated: September 19, 2013 GLANCY BINKOW& GOLDBERG LLP 2 By: /s/ Robert Prongay Robert Prongay, Esq. 3 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Phone: (310) 201-9150 Fax: (310) 201-9160 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Dale Duncan 6 8 Pursuant to Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), all signatories concur in filing this stipulation. Dated: September 19, 2013 By: /s/ Jennifer C. Bretan Jennifer C. Bretan 9 *** [PROPOSED] ORDER 10 11 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The CMC is reset for 1/23/14 9/23/13 S 14 15 16 17 S DISTRICT Chen TE Hon. EdwardCM.Court Judge A United States District T ERED O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO NO 18 RT J ER 20 21 A H 19 . Chen ward M udge Ed LI Dated: UNIT ED ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI SCO 13 at 9:00 a.m. A joint CMC Statement shall be filed by 1/16/14. RT U O F ENWICK & W ES T LLP 12 R NIA 7 FO 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 4 CASE NO. CV 13-03567 EMC CASE NO. CV 13-03872 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?