Brado v. Vocera Communications Inc et al
Filing
38
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC re 36 by John B. Grotting, Martin J. Silver, Brian D. Ascher, William R. Zerella, Vocera Communications Inc, Robert J. Zollars, Jeffrey H. Hillebrand, Howard E. Janzen, Donald F. Wood, Hany M. Nada, John N. McMullen, Brent D. Lang Case Management Statement due by 1/16/2014. Case Management Conference set for 1/23/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/23/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI SCO
F ENWICK & W ES T LLP
12
13
SUSAN S. MUCK (CSB NO. 126930)
smuck@fenwick.com
CATHERINE KEVANE (CSB NO. 215501)
ckevane@fenwick.com
JENNIFER BRETAN (CSB NO. 233475)
jbretan@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone:
(415) 875-2300
Facsimile:
(415) 281-1350
RONNIE SOLOMON (CSB NO. 284923)
rsolomon@fenwick.com
Silicon Valley Center, 801 California Street
Mountain View, California 94041
Phone: 650.988.8500
Fax: 650.938.5200
Attorneys for Defendants Vocera Communications,
Inc., Robert J. Zollars, Brent D. Lang, Martin J. Silver,
William R. Zerella, Brian D. Ascher, John B. Grotting,
Jeffrey H. Hillebrand, Howard E. Janzen, John N.
McMullen, Hany M. Nada, and Donald F. Wood
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
MICHAEL BRADO, Individually and on Behalf
of All Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
VOCERA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
ROBERT J. ZOLLARS, BRENT D. LANG,
MARTIN J. SILVER, WILLIAM R. ZERELLA,
BRIAN D. ASCHER, JOHN B. GROTTING,
JEFFREY H. HILLEBRAND, HOWARD E.
JANZEN, JOHN N. MCMULLEN, HANY M.
NADA, DONALD F. WOOD, J.P. MORGAN
SECURITIES LLC, PIPER JAFFRAY & CO.,
ROBERT W. BAIRD & CO. INCORPORATED,
WILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY, L.L.C.,
WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC, and
LEERINK SWANN LLC,
Case No. CV 13-03567 EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES
Judge: The Honorable Edward M. Chen
Date Action Filed: August 1, 2013
Defendants.
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
CASE NO. CV 13-03567 EMC
CASE NO. CV 13-03872 EMC
1
2
DALE DUNCAN, Individually and on Behalf of
All Others Similarly Situated,
Case No. CV 13-03872 EMC
Judge: The Honorable Edward M. Chen
3
Plaintiff,
4
vs.
Date Action Filed: August 21, 2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
VOCERA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
ROBERT J. ZOLLARS, BRENT D. LANG,
MARTIN J. SILVER, WILLIAM R. ZERELLA,
BRIAN D. ASCHER, JOHN B. GROTTING,
JEFFREY H. HILLEBRAND, HOWARD E.
JANZEN, JOHN N. MCMULLEN, HANY M.
NADA, DONALD F. WOOD, J.P. MORGAN
SECURITIES LLC, PIPER JAFFRAY & CO.,
ROBERT W. BAIRD & CO. INCORPORATED,
WILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY, L.L.C.,
WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC, and
LEERINK SWANN LLC,
11
Defendants.
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI SCO
F ENWICK & W ES T LLP
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
CASE NO. CV 13-03567 EMC
CASE NO. CV 13-03872 EMC
1
WHEREAS, the above-captioned actions, Brado v. Vocera Communications, Inc. et al.,
2
Case No. CV-13-03567 EMC, filed on August 1, 2013 (“Brado”) and Duncan v. Vocera
3
Communications, Inc. et al., Case No. CV-13-03872 EMC, filed on August 21, 2013 (“Duncan”)
4
(together, the “Securities Actions”), are proposed class actions alleging violations of the federal
5
securities laws against Vocera Communications, Inc., (“Vocera” or the “Company”), certain
6
individual officers and directors of the Company, and certain investment banks that served as
7
underwriters in connection with the Company’s initial public offering, (collectively,
8
“Defendants”); and
9
WHEREAS, on August 1, 2013, this Court issued an Order Setting Initial Case
10
Management Conference And ADR Deadlines (Dkt. No. 2) in Brado, the first-filed action, setting
11
the following deadlines:
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI SCO
F ENWICK & W ES T LLP
12
1.
October 10, 2013 for the parties to comply with certain requirements under the
13
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Northern District of California Civil
14
Local Rules (“Local Rules” or “Civil L.R.”) and Alternative Dispute Resolution
15
(“ADR”) Local Rules regarding discovery, early settlement, and the ADR Multi-
16
Option Program; and
17
2.
October 24, 2013 for the parties to file a Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial
18
disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file a Joint Case
19
Management Statement; and
20
3.
October 31, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. for an initial case management conference; and
21
WHEREAS, on September 17, 2013, the Court issued an Order deeming the Securities
22
Actions “related cases” within the meaning of Northern District of California Civil Local Rule
23
(“Civil L.R.”) 3-12 and ordering that the case management deadlines in the reassigned case be
24
rescheduled (Dkts. 33, 34);
25
WHEREAS, the Securities Actions are subject to the requirements of the Private
26
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub.L. No. 104-67, 109 Stat. 737 (1995) (the “Reform
27
Act”), which sets forth specialized procedures for the administration of securities class actions;
28
and
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
1
CASE NO. CV 13-03567 EMC
CASE NO. CV 13-03872 EMC
1
2
WHEREAS, the Reform Act provides for the appointment of a lead plaintiff to act on
behalf of the purported class following consolidation (15 U.S.C. §78u-4(a)(3)(B)(ii)); and
3
WHEREAS, on September 30, 2013, motions for consolidation and for appointment of
4
lead plaintiff in the consolidated action are expected to be filed (“Lead Plaintiff Motions”); and
5
6
7
8
9
WHEREAS, the process for approval of lead counsel will follow the Court’s
determination on lead plaintiff; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, the parties expect the Court to set a schedule for a consolidated
complaint to be filed; and
WHEREAS, defendants anticipate filing motion(s) to dismiss in response to the
10
consolidated complaint and that the parties will submit a briefing schedule to the Court in
11
connection with any such motion(s); and
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI SCO
F ENWICK & W ES T LLP
12
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Reform Act, unless otherwise ordered by the Court,
13
discovery in this action is stayed during the pendency of any motion to dismiss (15 U.S.C. § 78u-
14
4(b)(3)(B)); and
15
WHEREAS, counsel for the plaintiffs and defendants in the above-captioned actions
16
respectfully submit that good cause exists to vacate the existing October 31, 2013 initial case
17
management conference and associated ADR deadlines until such time as the Court has the
18
opportunity to rule on the appointment of lead plaintiff and approval of lead counsel.
19
20
21
IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, by and between the
undersigned counsel for the parties, that:
i.
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-2, the Initial Case Management Conference scheduled
22
for October 31, 2013 be vacated, along with any associated deadlines under the
23
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules, to be rescheduled for a date that
24
is either 30 days after the filing of the consolidated complaint or 30 days after the
25
Court rules on defendants’ anticipated motion(s) to dismiss the consolidated
26
complaint, as the Court shall determine to be appropriate; and
27
ii.
that all associated ADR Multi-Option Program deadlines likewise be deferred; and
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
2
CASE NO. CV 13-03567 EMC
CASE NO. CV 13-03872 EMC
1
iii.
that any case management conference and associated deadlines being rescheduled
2
by the Court in the recently related Duncan matter, Case No. CV-13-03872 EMC,
3
be similarly scheduled in light of the foregoing.
4
Dated: September 19, 2013
5
By: /s/ Jennifer C. Bretan
Jennifer C. Bretan, Esq.
6
555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 875-2300
Facsimile: (415) 281-1350
7
8
9
Attorneys for Vocera Communications, Inc., Robert J.
Zollars, Brent D. Lang, Martin J. Silver, William R.
Zerella, Brian D. Ascher, John B. Grotting, Jeffrey H.
Hillebrand, Howard E. Janzen, John N. McMullen,
Hany M. Nada, and Donald F. Wood
10
11
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI SCO
F ENWICK & W ES T LLP
12
Dated: September 19, 2013
13
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
By: /s/ Norman J. Blears
Norman J. Blears, Esq.
14
525 University Avenue, 4th Floor
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Phone: (650) 463-4001
Fax: (650) 463-4199
15
16
17
Attorneys for Defendants J.P. Morgan Securities LLC,
Piper Jaffray & Co., Robert W. Baird & Co.
Incorporated, William Blair & Company, L.L.C., Wells
Fargo Securities, LLC, and Leerink Swann LLC
18
19
20
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Dated: September 19, 2013
SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP
By: /s/ Hal Cunningham
Hal Cunningham, Esq.
21
22
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Phone: (310) 201-9150
Fax: (310) 201-9160
23
24
Attorneys for Plaintiff Michael Brado
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
3
CASE NO. CV 13-03567 EMC
CASE NO. CV 13-03872 EMC
Dated: September 19, 2013
GLANCY BINKOW& GOLDBERG LLP
2
By: /s/ Robert Prongay
Robert Prongay, Esq.
3
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Phone: (310) 201-9150
Fax: (310) 201-9160
4
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff Dale Duncan
6
8
Pursuant to Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), all signatories concur in filing this stipulation.
Dated: September 19, 2013
By: /s/ Jennifer C. Bretan
Jennifer C. Bretan
9
***
[PROPOSED] ORDER
10
11
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The CMC is reset for 1/23/14
9/23/13
S
14
15
16
17
S DISTRICT
Chen
TE Hon. EdwardCM.Court Judge
A United States District
T
ERED
O ORD D
IT IS S
DIFIE
AS MO
NO
18
RT
J
ER
20
21
A
H
19
. Chen
ward M
udge Ed
LI
Dated:
UNIT
ED
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI SCO
13
at 9:00 a.m. A joint CMC Statement
shall be filed by 1/16/14.
RT
U
O
F ENWICK & W ES T LLP
12
R NIA
7
FO
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
4
CASE NO. CV 13-03567 EMC
CASE NO. CV 13-03872 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?