Brado v. Vocera Communications Inc et al

Filing 85

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 84 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time to File Reply Brief filed by Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Baltimore County Employees' Retirement System. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/3/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

JOEL H. BERNSTEIN
JOSEPH A. FONTI
LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
140 Broadway
New York, New York 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Lead Counsel for the Class, and
Counsel for Baltimore County Employees’
Retirement System and Arkansas Teacher
Retirement System

8
9
10
11
12

JAMES WAGSTAFFE (95535)
MICHAEL VON LOEWENFELDT (178665)
KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
101 Missions Street, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105–1528
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

13
14

Counsel for Baltimore County Employees’
Retirement System and Arkansas Teacher
Retirement System

15
16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

20
21
22
23
24

IN RE VOCERA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
SECURITIES LITIGATION
______________________________________
This Document Relates To:
All Actions.

Case No. 3:13-cv-03567 EMC
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE
REPLY BRIEF

25
26

Judge: The Hon. Edward M. Chen

27

Date Action Filed: August 1, 2013

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

1

WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff’s Motion To Limit The Scope Of Confidentiality Agreements

2

Signed By Former Vocera Employees And For In Camera Review Of Documents is scheduled to

3

come before the Court on July 10, 2014;

4

WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff filed the Motion on April 22, 2014;

5

WHEREAS, Defendant filed an opposition on May 22, 2014;

6

WHEREAS, the current deadline for Lead Plaintiff to file a reply brief is June 5, 2014;

7

WHEREAS, to accommodate conflicts in the work and personal schedules of Lead

8

Plaintiff’s counsel, Lead Plaintiff has asked, and Defendants have agreed, that Lead Plaintiff may

9

have until June 19, 2014 to file a reply brief; and

10
11
12

WHEREAS, a June 19, 2014 reply filing date will provide the Court with three weeks to
review the motion instead of the two weeks required by the Local Rules;
IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED that the deadline for Lead Plaintiff to file a reply

13

brief should be extended from June 5, 2014 to June 19, 2014.

14

Dated: June 3, 2014

15

By: /s/ Joseph A. Fonti
Joseph A. Fonti, Esq.

16

140 Broadway
New York, New York 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

17
18
19

Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Baltimore County
Employees’ Retirement System and Arkansas
Teacher Retirement System

20
21

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP

Dated: June 3, 2014

FENWICK & WEST LLP
By: /s/ Jennifer C. Bretan
Jennifer C. Bretan, Esq.

22
23

555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

24
25
26

Attorneys for Vocera Communications, Inc., Robert J.
Zollars, Brent D. Lang, Martin J. Silver, William R.
Zerella, Brian D. Ascher, John B. Grotting, Jeffrey H.
Hillebrand, Howard E. Janzen, John N. McMullen,
Hany M. Nada, and Donald F. Wood

27
28
1185569-1

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

06/03/2014 09:11 AM

1

Dated: June 3, 2014

2

By: /s/ Simona G. Strauss
Simona G. Strauss, Esq.

3

2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

4
5
6

Attorneys for Defendants J.P. Morgan Securities LLC,
Piper Jaffray & Co., Robert W. Baird & Co.
Incorporated, William Blair & Company, L.L.C., Wells
Fargo Securities, LLC, and Leerink Partners LLC

7
8
9
10

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

Pursuant to Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), all signatories concur in filing this stipulation.
Dated: June 3, 2014

11

By: /s/ Joseph A. Fonti
Joseph A. Fonti

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1185569-1

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

06/03/2014 09:11 AM

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

NO

7

O
IT IS S
DIFIED
AS MO

RT

8

dward
Judge E

ER

10

n

M. Che

A

H

9

R NIA

6

Edward M. Chen
United StatesDEREDJudge
OR District

FO

5

S

Dated: ___________________

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

4

6/3/14

LI

3

UNIT
ED

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1185569-1

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

06/03/2014 09:11 AM