Siegal et al v. Gamble et al
Filing
42
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXCEEDING PAGE LIMITS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/26/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2015)
1 EDWARD S. ZUSMAN (SBN 154366)
ezusman@mzclaw.com
2 KEVIN K. ENG (SBN 209036)
keng@mzclaw.com
3 MARKUN ZUSMAN FRENIERE & COMPTON LLP
465 California Street, 5th Floor
4 San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 438-4515
5 Facsimile: (415) 434-4505
6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12 STEVEN SIEGAL, JAMES RYBICKI, DAVID
GROBLEBE, individually and as General Partner
13 of GROBCO II, and CHRISTIAN WIPF, ON
BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL
14 INDIVIDUALS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,)
)
vs.
)
)
G. THOMAS GAMBLE, LOREN J. MILLER,
)
HENRY LOWENSTEIN, PAUL W. BATEMAN, )
EDWARD M. GABRIEL, JAMES S. MAYER,
)
BEHROOZ SARAFRAZ, LYNN BLYSTONE,
)
ALFRED LOPEZ, MASTON CUNNINGHAM,
)
JOHN DURBIN, GREG BILLINGER, K&L
)
GATES LLP, CHARLES A. DALE III, JOSHUA )
LANE, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 100,
)
INCLUSIVE,
)
)
Defendants.)
Case No. 13 Civ. 3570-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE EXCEEDING PAGE
LIMITATIONS
23
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PAGE LIMITATIONS
CASE NO. 13 CIV. 3570-RS
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and certain Defendants (together, the “Settling Parties”) have
1
2 entered into a Settlement Agreement;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Plaintiffs will, on January 28, 2015,
3
4 file a Motion For Preliminary Approval of the Settlement;
WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement involves multiple parties, and implicates jointly
5
6 administered proceedings currently in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of
7 Delaware (Case No. 12-12291 (MFW)) (the “Bankruptcy Proceedings”);
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have been preparing their Motion and supporting documents in
8
9 anticipation of the filing on January 28, 2015;
WHEREAS, the Court’s Civil Local Rules provide for a 25-page limitation for motions
10
11 (see Civil L.R. 7-2(b));
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs anticipate that they will require additional pages beyond the 25-
12
13 page limit, due to the complexities of the case, including large number of parties, the related
14 Bankruptcy Proceedings, and the multiple legal issues implicated in the Motion For Preliminary
15 Approval of the Settlement;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs believe the additional discussion will benefit the parties and the
16
17 Court in that it will more clearly lay out the factual circumstances, procedural history, and
18 discussion of the legal analysis relevant to the upcoming Motion;
19
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs request an additional 5 pages for their Motion;
20
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between
21 and among all parties, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows (the “Stipulation”):
22
1.
Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to exceed page limitations shall be granted;
23
2.
Plaintiffs’ Memorandum In Support of Motion For Preliminary Approval shall be
24
not more than 30 pages.
25 Dated:
January 22, 2015_____
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
26
27
By
/s/
George S. Wang
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PAGE LIMITATIONS
CASE NO. 13 CIV. 3570-RS\
Attorneys for Defendants Paul W. Bateman, Greg
Billinger, Maston Cunningham, John Durbin,
Edward M. Gabriel, Henry Lowenstein, James S.
Mayer, and Loren J. Miller
1
2
3
4 Dated: January 22, 2015______
AKERMAN LLP
5
6
By
/s/
Karen Palladino Ciccone
7
Attorneys for Defendant Lynn Blystone
8
9
10 Dated:
January 23, 2015______
By
11
/s/_____________________________
Behrooz Sarafraz
Defendant Pro Se
12
13
14 Dated: January 21, 2015______
COOKE KOBRICK & WU LLP
15
By
16
17
/s/
Christopher C. Cooke
Attorneys for Defendant Alfred Lopez
18
19 Dated:
January 26, 2015______
REED SMITH LLP
20
By
21
22
/s/
James Neudecker
Attorneys for Defendant G. Thomas Gamble
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
January 26, 2015______
K&L GATES LLP
By
/s/
Charles Tea
Attorneys for Defendants K&L Gates LLP, Charles
A. Dale III, and Joshua Lane
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PAGE LIMITATIONS
CASE NO. 13 CIV. 3570-RS\
1
2 Dated:
3
4
5
January 21, 2015
MARKUN ZUSMAN FRENIERE & COMPTON
LLP
By
/s/
Kevin K. Eng
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PAGE LIMITATIONS
CASE NO. 13 CIV. 3570-RS\
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and pursuant to Rule 7-11 of the Civil Local Rules, the
3 Court hereby adopts and approves the terms of the parties’ stipulation set forth above. Plaintiffs’
4 Administrative Motion to exceed page limitations is granted. Plaintiffs’ Memorandum In Support
5 Of Motion For Preliminary Approval shall be not more than 30 pages in length.
6 IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8 Dated: ____________________
1/26/15
9
__________________________________
The Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PAGE LIMITATIONS
CASE NO. 13 CIV. 3570-RS\
1
FILER’S ATTESTATION
2
I, Kevin K. Eng, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this
3
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that
4
George S. Wang, Karen Ciccone, Behrooz Sarafraz, Christopher C. Cooke, James Neudecker,
5
Charles Tea, and Kevin K. Eng concur in this filing.
6
7
8
9
/s/
Kevin K. Eng
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PAGE LIMITATIONS
CASE NO. 13 CIV. 3570-RS\
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?