Walker v. MB Financial Bank, N.A.

Filing 23

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The court ORDERS Ms. Walker once again to show cause why she has failed to file either an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to MB Financial's motion to stay this action. She shall do so by filing a written res ponse by 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 5, 2013. The filing of a statement of non-opposition will discharge this order to show cause. The failure to file a response may be construed as a non-opposition to MB Financial's motion and result in it being granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 11/4/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 Northern District of California 10 San Francisco Division KENDRA NICOLE WALKER, 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 Plaintiff, 13 No. C 13-03601 LB SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 14 MB FINANCIAL BANK, N.A., 15 Defendant. _____________________________________/ 16 Plaintiff Kendra Nicole Walker filed this action against defendant MB Financial Bank, N.A. on 17 August 2, 2013. Complaint, ECF No. 1.1 She filed a First Amended Complaint on August 27, 2013. 18 FAC, ECF No. 5. MB Financial answered her First Amended Complaint on September 18, 2013. 19 Answer, ECF No. 9. All parties have consented to the undersigned’s jurisdiction. Consent (Ms. 20 Walker), ECF No. 7; Consent (MB Financial), ECF No. 14. 21 On September 23, 2013, MB Financial filed via the court’s ECF system a motion to stay this 22 action during the pendency and resolution of an Illinois state court case that was initiated prior to 23 this action. Motion, ECF No. 11. This meant that Ms. Walker’s deadline to file an opposition was 24 October 7, 2013. She did not, and she also did not file a statement of non-opposition. Thus, the 25 court ordered her to file a written response by 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 15, 2013 showing 26 27 28 1 Citations are to the Electronic Case File (“ECF”) with pin cites to the electronicallygenerated page numbers at the top of the document. C13-03601 LB SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 1 cause why she failed to file either an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to MB Financial’s 2 motion to stay this action. First Order to Show Cause, ECF No. 18. The court also noted that the 3 failure to file a response could be construed as a non-opposition to MB Financial’s motion and result 4 in it being granted. Id. 5 On October 14, 2013, Ms. Walker filed a response. Response to First Order to Show Cause, 6 ECF No. 19. In it, her counsel explains that while her opposition to MB Financial’s motion is 7 “substantially completed,” “on the due date of the opposition, [he] suffered a flareup of a chronic 8 cardiac condition which required emergency medical attention” and prevented him from filing the 9 opposition on time. Id. That same day, the parties filed a stipulation that, among other things, MB Financial to file any reply by November 4, 2013, and the hearing on the motion to December 5, 12 For the Northern District of California continued the deadline for Ms. Walker to file her opposition to October 28, 2013, the deadline for 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 2013. Stipulation, ECF No. 20. The court granted the stipulation on October 15, 2013. Granted 13 Stipulation, ECF No. 21. 14 October 28, 2013 was seven days ago and yet Ms. Walker still has not filed her opposition to 15 MB Financial’s motion. See generally Docket. Accordingly, the court ORDERS Ms. Walker once 16 again to show cause why she has failed to file either an opposition or a statement of non-opposition 17 to MB Financial’s motion to stay this action. She shall do so by filing a written response by 5:00 18 p.m. on Tuesday, November 5, 2013. The filing of a statement of non-opposition will discharge 19 this order to show cause. The failure to file a response may be construed as a non-opposition to MB 20 Financial’s motion and result in it being granted. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 4, 2013 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 C13-03601 LB SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?