Kripalani v. Wells Fargo N.A.

Filing 17

ORDER DENYING APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY HEARING ON STAY PENDING DECISION ON APPEAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 17, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C-13-3624 MMC 11 12 In re Bankruptcy Case No. 13-30374 13 KISHORE KRIPALANI, ORDER DENYING APPELLANT’S REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY HEARING ON STAY PENDING DECISION ON APPEAL Debtor 14 15 / 16 17 Before the Court is appellant Kishore Kripalani’s (“Kripalani”) Request for 18 Emergency Hearing on Stay Pending Appeal, filed October 17, 2013, by which Kripalani 19 again seeks a hearing by this Court on his earlier-filed Request for Staying Pending Appeal 20 of the Bankruptcy Court’s order finding an unlawful detainer action by appellee Wells Fargo 21 Bank, N.A. against Kripalani is not subject to the automatic stay provisions of the 22 Bankruptcy Code. Having read and considered the instant request, the Court rules as 23 follows. 24 As set forth in the Court’s Order of October 7, 2013, a district court, “in determining 25 whether an appellant is entitled to a stay pending appeal” under Rule 8005 of the Federal 26 Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, “does not consider the matter in the first instance, but, 27 rather, reviews the bankruptcy court’s denial of a request for a stay for abuse of discretion.” 28 (See Order, filed October 7, 2013, at 2:12-14.) Here, the Bankruptcy Court has not yet 1 heard Kripalani’s request for a stay pending appeal. As Kripalani points out, the 2 Bankruptcy Court has only denied Kripalani’s request to have the hearing on shortened 3 time. 4 Further, to the extent Kripalani again seeks in the alternative a stay “pending a 5 hearing on the merits of the stay application” (see Request, filed October 17, 2013, at 2:5- 6 7), such request is again unsupported by citation to any authority, nor has good cause 7 otherwise been shown. 8 Accordingly, the instant request is hereby DENIED. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: October 17, 2013 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?