Kripalani v. Wells Fargo N.A.
Filing
17
ORDER DENYING APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY HEARING ON STAY PENDING DECISION ON APPEAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 17, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C-13-3624 MMC
11
12
In re
Bankruptcy Case No. 13-30374
13
KISHORE KRIPALANI,
ORDER DENYING APPELLANT’S
REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY HEARING
ON STAY PENDING DECISION ON
APPEAL
Debtor
14
15
/
16
17
Before the Court is appellant Kishore Kripalani’s (“Kripalani”) Request for
18
Emergency Hearing on Stay Pending Appeal, filed October 17, 2013, by which Kripalani
19
again seeks a hearing by this Court on his earlier-filed Request for Staying Pending Appeal
20
of the Bankruptcy Court’s order finding an unlawful detainer action by appellee Wells Fargo
21
Bank, N.A. against Kripalani is not subject to the automatic stay provisions of the
22
Bankruptcy Code. Having read and considered the instant request, the Court rules as
23
follows.
24
As set forth in the Court’s Order of October 7, 2013, a district court, “in determining
25
whether an appellant is entitled to a stay pending appeal” under Rule 8005 of the Federal
26
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, “does not consider the matter in the first instance, but,
27
rather, reviews the bankruptcy court’s denial of a request for a stay for abuse of discretion.”
28
(See Order, filed October 7, 2013, at 2:12-14.) Here, the Bankruptcy Court has not yet
1
heard Kripalani’s request for a stay pending appeal. As Kripalani points out, the
2
Bankruptcy Court has only denied Kripalani’s request to have the hearing on shortened
3
time.
4
Further, to the extent Kripalani again seeks in the alternative a stay “pending a
5
hearing on the merits of the stay application” (see Request, filed October 17, 2013, at 2:5-
6
7), such request is again unsupported by citation to any authority, nor has good cause
7
otherwise been shown.
8
Accordingly, the instant request is hereby DENIED.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
Dated: October 17, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?