Hall v. Hamilton Family Center

Filing 27

ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT TO APRIL 2, 2014, as to 24 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint. Motion Hearing set for 4/2/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/07/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2014)

1 GENESE K. DOPSON (SBN 108333)
Email: [e-mail]
2 LENORE C. KELLY (SBN 170891)
Email: [e-mail]
3 JOY J. CHEN (SBN 273894)
Email: [e-mail]
4 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
5 525 Market Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
6 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
7
Attorneys for Defendant
8 HAMILTON FAMILY CENTER
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

12 EVYONNE RENEE HALL,
13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,

14

v.

15
16

HAMILTON FAMILY CENTER
Defendant.

17

Present Hearing Date: February 12 2014

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for

20

23

Action Filed: August 6, 2013

STIPULATION

19

22

ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
COMPLAINT TO APRIL 2, 2014

Stip. to Continue Hearing To: April 2, 2014

18

21

Case No.: 13-CV-03646 WHO

Leave to File Amended Complaint, presently set for February 12, 2014, is continued to April 2,
2014.
Dated: January 6, 2014

24

RICHARD M. ROGERS, Attorney at Law
By:

25

/s/ Richard M. Rogers
Richard M. Rogers
Attorneys for Plaintiff EVYONNE RENEE HALL

26 ///
27 ///
28
1
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT TO APRIL 2, 2014

Case No.: C13-03646 WHO
Error! Unknown document property name.

1
2

Dated: January ___, 2014

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER
LLP

3
By:

4

Genese K. Dopson
Attorneys for Defendant HAMILTON FAMILY CENTER

5
6
7
8

ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING
The parties having stipulated to continue the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to

9 Amend Complaint is continued to April 2, 2014.
10 Dated: January 7, 2014
11
Honorable William H. Orrick

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT TO APRIL 2, 2014

Case No.: C13-03646 WHO
Error! Unknown document property name.

1
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Evyonne R. Hall v. Hamilton Family Center
United States Northern Dist. Case No.: 13-CV-03646 WHO

3

At the time of service I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am
employed in the County of San Francisco, California. My business address is 525 Market Street,
4 17th Floor, San Francisco, California 94105. On this date I served the following document(s):
5
6

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT TO APRIL 2, 2014

7 on the person or persons listed below, through their respective attorneys of record in this action, by
placing true copies thereof in sealed envelopes or packages addressed as shown below by the
8 following means of service:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

:
By United States Mail. I placed the envelope(s) for collection and mailing,
following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business’s
practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that
correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course
of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully
prepaid.
:
By Electronic Service. Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to
accept service by electronic transmission, I caused the documents to be sent to the persons
at the electronic notification addresses listed below.
:
By Overnight Delivery. I enclosed the documents in an envelope or package
provided by an overnight delivery carrier and address to the persons at the addresses below.
I placed the envelope or package for collection and overnight delivery at an office or a
regularly utilized drop box of the overnight delivery carrier..
:
By Fax Transmission. Based on an agreement of the parties to accept service by
fax transmission, I faxed the documents to the persons at the fax numbers listed below. No
error was reported by the fax machine that I used.
Richard M. Rogers
Law Offices of Richard M. Rogers
100 Bush Street, Suite 1980
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Evyonne R. Hall
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
EXECUTED January 7, 2014 at San Francisco, California.

28
Richean Martin
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case No.: C13-03646 WHO
Error! Unknown document property name.