Borkowitz v. Colvin
Filing
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 11 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Requesting an Extension of Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment filed by James C. Borkowitz. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/18/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2013)
Case3:13-cv-03652-EMC Document11 Filed12/13/13 Page1 of 2
1
HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488)
2
3
4
5
1055 Lincoln Avenue
Post Office Box 5025
San Jose, California 95150-5025
Telephone: (408) 295-7755
Facsimile: (408) 295-7444
6
7
8
Attorney for Plaintiff
/jgl
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
15
JAMES C. BORKOWITZ,
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner,
Social Security Administration,
20
21
Defendant.
) Case No: 3:13-cv-03652 EMC
)
)
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
22
23
Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that: (1)
24
Plaintiff shall have a first extension of time of (60) days up through and including Monday,
25
February 17, 2014 in which to e-file his Motion for Summary Judgment; and (2) Defendant shall
26
file any opposition, including cross-motions, on or before March 17, 2014. This extension is
27
necessitated by the number of cases (8) the firm presently has pending before this and other
28
district courts that require briefing.
Case3:13-cv-03652-EMC Document11 Filed12/13/13 Page2 of 2
MELINDA L. HAAG
United States Attorney
1
2
3
Dated: December 13, 2013
/s/
ELIZABETH BARRY
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Social Security Administration
Dated: December 13, 2013
/s/
HARVEY P. SACKETT
Attorney for Plaintiff
JAMES C.BORKOWITZ
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
R NIA
FO
ER
H
19
RT
18
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
Chen
ard M.
dge Edw
Ju
NO
17
TED
GRAN
LI
16
Dated: December 18, 2013
UNIT
ED
15
RT
U
O
14
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
A
13
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?