Borkowitz v. Colvin

Filing 12

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 11 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Requesting an Extension of Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment filed by James C. Borkowitz. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/18/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:13-cv-03652-EMC Document11 Filed12/13/13 Page1 of 2 1 HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488) 2 3 4 5 1055 Lincoln Avenue Post Office Box 5025 San Jose, California 95150-5025 Telephone: (408) 295-7755 Facsimile: (408) 295-7444 6 7 8 Attorney for Plaintiff /jgl 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 JAMES C. BORKOWITZ, 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 20 21 Defendant. ) Case No: 3:13-cv-03652 EMC ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 22 23 Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that: (1) 24 Plaintiff shall have a first extension of time of (60) days up through and including Monday, 25 February 17, 2014 in which to e-file his Motion for Summary Judgment; and (2) Defendant shall 26 file any opposition, including cross-motions, on or before March 17, 2014. This extension is 27 necessitated by the number of cases (8) the firm presently has pending before this and other 28 district courts that require briefing. Case3:13-cv-03652-EMC Document11 Filed12/13/13 Page2 of 2 MELINDA L. HAAG United States Attorney 1 2 3 Dated: December 13, 2013 /s/ ELIZABETH BARRY Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration Dated: December 13, 2013 /s/ HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff JAMES C.BORKOWITZ 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. S R NIA FO ER H 19 RT 18 EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge Chen ard M. dge Edw Ju NO 17 TED GRAN LI 16 Dated: December 18, 2013 UNIT ED 15 RT U O 14 S DISTRICT TE C TA 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 A 13 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?