Wells Fargo Bank, National Association et al v. City of Richmond, California et al
Filing
36
Declaration of Rev. Marvin Webb in Support of 32 Opposition/Response to Motion filed byCity of Richmond, California, Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC. (Related document(s) 32 ) (Kronland, Scott) (Filed on 8/22/2013)
1 STEPHEN P. BERZON (SBN 46540)
SCOTT A. KRONLAND (SBN 171693)
2 JONATHAN WEISSGLASS (SBN 185008)
ERIC P. BROWN (SBN 284245)
3 Altshuler Berzon LLP
4 177 Post Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94108
5 Tel: (415) 421-7151
Fax: (415) 362-8064
6 E-mail: sberzon@altber.com
skronland@altber.com
7
jweissglass@altber.com
ebrown@altber.com
8
9 Attorneys for Defendants City of Richmond and
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
10
BRUCE REED GOODMILLER (SBN 121491)
WILLIAM A. FALIK (SBN 53499)
11 City Attorney
100 Tunnel Rd
CARLOS A. PRIVAT (SBN 197534)
Berkeley, CA 94705
12
Assistant City Attorney
Tel: (510) 540-5960
Fax: (510) 704-8803
13 CITY OF RICHMOND
450 Civic Center Plaza
E-mail: billfalik@gmail.com
14 Richmond, CA 94804
Telephone: (510) 620-6509
Attorney for Defendant
15
Facsimile: (510) 620-6518
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
E-mail: bruce_goodmiller@ci.richmond.ca.us
16
carlos_privat@ci.richmond.ca.us
17
Attorneys for Defendant City of Richmond
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
20
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
22 WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, et al.,
23
Plaintiffs,
24
25
v.
26 CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, a
27 municipality, and MORTGAGE
RESOLUTION PARTNERS LLC,
28
Defendants.
Case No. CV-13-3663-CRB
DECLARATION OF REV. MARVIN
WEBB IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’
OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Date:
Time:
Judge:
September 13, 2013
10:00 a.m.
Honorable Charles R. Breyer
Courtroom 6, 17th Floor
Webb Decl. iso Defendants’ Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Case No. CV-13-3663-CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?