Wells Fargo Bank, National Association et al v. City of Richmond, California et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE HEARINGS ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND FOR RELATED RELIEF filed by City of Richmond, California, Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kronland, Scott) (Filed on 8/26/2013)

1 STEPHEN P. BERZON (SBN 46540)
SCOTT A. KRONLAND (SBN 171693)
2 JONATHAN WEISSGLASS (SBN 185008)
ERIC P. BROWN (SBN 284245)
3
Altshuler Berzon LLP
4 177 Post Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94108
5 Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
6 E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
7
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
8
9 Attorneys for Defendants City of Richmond and
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

BRUCE REED GOODMILLER (SBN 121491)
City Attorney
CARLOS A. PRIVAT (SBN 197534)
Assistant City Attorney
CITY OF RICHMOND
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

WILLIAM A. FALIK (SBN 53499)
100 Tunnel Rd
Berkeley, CA 94705
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorney for Defendant
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC

17
18

Attorneys for Defendant City of Richmond

19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

21

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

22

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
23 ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

24
25
26

v.

CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, a
27 municipality, and MORTGAGE
RESOLUTION PARTNERS LLC,
28
Defendants.

Case No. CV-13-3663-CRB
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING
HEARINGS ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION AND FOR RELATED
RELIEF
Honorable Charles R. Breyer

[Proposed] Order Consolidating Hearings,
Case No. CV-13-3663-CRB

1

Good cause shown and pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court ORDERS as

2 follows:
3

1.

4
5

to dismiss;
2.

6
7

Plaintiffs shall have until August 30, 2013, to file their opposition to Defendants’ motion

Defendants shall have until September 4, 2013, to file any reply on their motion to
dismiss; and

3.

8

The hearings on the preliminary injunction and the motion to dismiss are set for
___________, 2013, at ______.

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12

Dated:

________________________________
Honorable Charles R. Breyer
United States District Court Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[Proposed] Order Consolidating Hearings,
Case No. CV-13-3663-CRB