Wells Fargo Bank, National Association et al v. City of Richmond, California et al

Filing 56

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 14 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

ROCKY C. TSAI (SBN 221452)
([e-mail])
ROPES & GRAY LLP
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Trustee, et al.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13
14

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, et al.
Plaintiffs,

15
16

v.

18

CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, a
municipality, and MORTGAGE
RESOLUTION PARTNERS LLC,

19

Defendants.

17

20
21
22
23
24

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV-13-3663-CRB

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO EXCEED STANDING ORDER
PAGE LIMIT
CIVIL L.R. 7-11
Honorable Charles R. Breyer

25
26
27
28
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT; Case
No. CV-13-3663-CRB

1
2
3

This Court having considered the papers and arguments regarding Plaintiffs’ Administrative
Motion For Leave To Exceed Standing Order Page Limit (“Motion”), and good cause appearing,
The Court hereby GRANTS the Motion, and accordingly grants Plaintiffs relief from the 15-

4

page limit set forth in Paragraph 5 of this Court’s Standing Order with respect to the Memorandum of

5

Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“PI Memorandum”)

6

and accepts the PI Memorandum as filed on August 8, 2013, inS DISTRIC
accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-2.

9

14

FO

LI

ER

H

13

RT

12

__________________________________________
CHARLES les R. Breyer
R. BREYER
har
J STATES
UNITEDudge C DISTRICT JUDGE

NO

11

DATED September 4, 2013

ERED

A

10

I

ORD
T IS SO

R NIA

S
IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

8

TC

RT
U
O

7

E
AT
T

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT; Case
No. CV-13-3663-CRB