Wells Fargo Bank, National Association et al v. City of Richmond, California et al
Filing
83
Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re 82 Notice of Appeal. (mclS, COURT STAFF)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOTICE OF APPEAL NOTIFICATION FORM
Please Fill Out Completely
October 17, 2013
CASE INFORMATION:
Short Case Title: WELLS FARGO BANK ET AL -v- CITY OF RICHMOND ET AL
Court of Appeals No. (leave blank if unassigned )
U.S. District Court, Division & Judge Name: USDC, Northern District of CA, Judge Charles R. Breyer
Criminal and/or Civil Case No.: CV 13-03663 CRB
Date Complaint/Indictment/Petition Filed: 8/7/13
Date Appealed order/judgment entered 9/16/13
Date NOA filed 10/16/13
Date(s) of Indictment Plea Hearing Sentencing
COA Status (check one):
9 granted in full (attach order)
9 granted in part (attach order)
9 denied in full (send record)
9 pending
Court Reporter(s) Name & Phone Number: Bell Balle (415) 373-2529
Magistrate Judge’s Order? If so, please attach.
FEE INFORMATION
Date Docket Fee Paid: 10/16/13
Date FP granted:
Is FP pending? 9 yes 9 no
US Government Appeal? 9 yes 9 no
Companion Cases? Please list:
Date Docket Fee Billed:
Date FP denied:
Was FP limited 9? Revoked 9?
Please attach copy of any order granting, denying or revoking FP.
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellate Counsel:
Rocky C. Tsai
Ropes & Gray LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94111-4006
Appellee Counsel:
Scott Alan Kronland
Altshuler Berzon LLP
177 Post Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94108
(See docket sheet for more counsel)
9 retained 9 CJA 9 FPD 9 Pro Se 9 Other
Please attach appointment order.
DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Prisoner ID:
Address:
Custody:
Bail:
AMENDED NOTIFICATION INFORMATION
Date Fees Paid:
9th Circuit Docket Number:
Name & Phone Number of Person Completing this Form: Maria Loo (415) 522-2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?