Bank of New York Mellon v. City of Richmond, California et al

Filing 18

Order, signed 8/26/13, by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting 17 Stipulation For Filing of Second Amended Complaint.(klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (f/k/a The Bank of New York), as Trustee, on behalf of the Trusts listed in Exhibit A; and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, on behalf of the Trusts listed in Exhibit B, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Case No.: 13-cv-3664-JCS [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, a municipality; RICHMOND CITY COUNCIL; MORTGAGE RESOLUTION PARTNERS L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company; and GORDIAN SWORD LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Defendant. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. 13-CV-3664-JCS 1 2 WHEREAS, on August 7, 29013, The Bank of New York Mellon (f/k/a The Bank of New York), as trustee, initiated this action against Defendants (the “Action”); 3 WHEREAS, on August 9, 2013, The Bank of New York Mellon filed the First 4 Amended Complaint, which added an additional trustee as plaintiff, U.S. Bank National 5 Association; 6 WHEREAS, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (f/k/a The Bank of 7 New York Trust Company, N.A.), Wilmington Trust Company, and Wilmington Trust, 8 National Association, as trustees, seek relief against Defendants arising out of the same series 9 of occurrences; 10 THE PARTIES STIPULATED through their respective attorneys that Plaintiffs may 11 file a Second Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached to the Stipulation For Filing 12 of Second Amended Complaint (the “Stipulation”). The Second Amended Complaint adds 13 The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (f/k/a The Bank of New York Trust 14 Company, N.A.), Wilmington Trust Company, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, 15 as trustees, as Plaintiffs, and contains other minor revisions. 16 17 THE PARTIES FURTHER STIPULATED that the Second Amended Complaint is deemed filed on the date of entry of the Court’s order pursuant to the Stipulation. 18 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. R NIA FO H ER LI RT 23 ________________________ se h C Spero Hon. Joseph pC.. Spero Judge Jo NO 22 08/26/13 Dated:_____________ A 21 UNIT ED 20 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 19 N F D IS T IC T O R C 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. 13-CV-3664-JCS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?