Bank of New York Mellon v. City of Richmond, California et al
Filing
18
Order, signed 8/26/13, by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting 17 Stipulation For Filing of Second Amended Complaint.(klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (f/k/a
The Bank of New York), as Trustee, on behalf
of the Trusts listed in Exhibit A; and U.S.
BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as
Trustee, on behalf of the Trusts listed in Exhibit
B,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Case No.: 13-cv-3664-JCS
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
STIPULATION FOR FILING OF
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, a
municipality; RICHMOND CITY COUNCIL;
MORTGAGE RESOLUTION PARTNERS
L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company;
and GORDIAN SWORD LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 13-CV-3664-JCS
1
2
WHEREAS, on August 7, 29013, The Bank of New York Mellon (f/k/a The Bank of
New York), as trustee, initiated this action against Defendants (the “Action”);
3
WHEREAS, on August 9, 2013, The Bank of New York Mellon filed the First
4
Amended Complaint, which added an additional trustee as plaintiff, U.S. Bank National
5
Association;
6
WHEREAS, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (f/k/a The Bank of
7
New York Trust Company, N.A.), Wilmington Trust Company, and Wilmington Trust,
8
National Association, as trustees, seek relief against Defendants arising out of the same series
9
of occurrences;
10
THE PARTIES STIPULATED through their respective attorneys that Plaintiffs may
11
file a Second Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached to the Stipulation For Filing
12
of Second Amended Complaint (the “Stipulation”). The Second Amended Complaint adds
13
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (f/k/a The Bank of New York Trust
14
Company, N.A.), Wilmington Trust Company, and Wilmington Trust, National Association,
15
as trustees, as Plaintiffs, and contains other minor revisions.
16
17
THE PARTIES FURTHER STIPULATED that the Second Amended Complaint is
deemed filed on the date of entry of the Court’s order pursuant to the Stipulation.
18
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
R NIA
FO
H
ER
LI
RT
23
________________________
se h C Spero
Hon. Joseph pC.. Spero
Judge Jo
NO
22
08/26/13
Dated:_____________
A
21
UNIT
ED
20
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
19
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 13-CV-3664-JCS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?