Bank of New York Mellon v. City of Richmond, California et al
Filing
47
RESPONSE to re 44 Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons by Defendants Mortgage Resolution Partners L.L.C. and Gordian Sword LLC by Bank of New York Mellon, Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.. (Pollock, Bronwyn) (Filed on 10/31/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
MAYER BROWN LLP
DONALD M. FALK (SBN 150256)
dfalk@mayerbrown.com
Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112
Tel: 650-331-2000
Fax: 650-331-2060
BRONWYN F. POLLOCK (SBN 210912)
bpollock@mayerbrown.com
NOAH B. STEINSAPIR (SBN 252715)
nsteinsapir@mayerbrown.com
MICHAEL D. SHAPIRO (SBN 271912)
mshapiro@mayerbrown.com
350 S. Grand Ave., 25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503
Tel: 213-229-9500
Fax: 213-625-0248
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
(f/k/a The Bank of New York) and
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST
COMPANY, N.A. (f/k/a The Bank of New York Trust
Company, N.A.) as Trustees for the Trusts listed on
Exhibit A to the Second Amended Complaint
[Additional counsel listed on signature page.]
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (f/k/a
The Bank of New York) et al.
19
20
Plaintiffs,
v.
21
22
23
24
CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, a
municipality; RICHMOND CITY COUNCIL;
MORTGAGE RESOLUTION PARTNERS
L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company;
and GORDIAN SWORD LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company;
25
Case No. 3:13-cv-3664-CRB
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO
CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED
ENTITIES OR PERSONS BY
DEFENDANTS MORTGAGE
RESOLUTION PARTNERS L.L.C. AND
GORDIAN SWORD LLC (DKT. 44)
Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer
Complaint filed: August 7, 2013
Defendants.
26
27
28
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES;
CASE NO. 13-cv-3664-CRB
707860856.1
1
Plaintiffs The Bank of New York Mellon (f/k/a The Bank of New York), as trustee, The
2
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (f/k/a The Bank of New York Trust Company,
3
N.A.), as trustee, U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, Wilmington Trust Company, as
4
trustee, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee (collectively, “Plaintiffs”),
5
respond to the Certification of Interested Entities or Persons submitted by Defendants Mortgage
6
Resolution Partners L.L.C. (“MRP”) and Gordian Sword LLC (“Gordian”) (Dkt. 44).
7
MRP and Gordian disclose that the two LLCs have about 60 members but intentionally
8
withhold the identities of those members, and fail to disclose other individuals or entities that
9
have a financial interest in MRP or Gordian, or an interest in the outcome of the case. Local
10
Rule 3-16 requires MRP and Gordian to disclose any persons or entities that have “a financial
11
interest (of any kind) in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding” or “any
12
kind of interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding.” L.R. 3-
13
16(b)(1). “Financial interest” means “ownership of a legal or equitable interest, however small,”
14
or “a relationship as director, advisor, or other active participant in the affairs of a party.” 28
15
U.S.C. 455(d)(4); L.R. 3-16(b)(2). Defendants suggest that because they could not locate case
16
law specific to LLCs that they somehow are exempt from full disclosure. But that turns the rule
17
on its head—the rule requires broad disclosure unless exempted (e.g., expressly exempted from
18
the definition of “financial interest” is “[o]wnership in a mutual or common investment fund that
19
holds securities . . . unless the judge participates in the management of the fund”). 28 U.S.C.
20
§ 455(d)(4)(i); L.R. 3-16(b)(2). Further, Delaware law, under which MRP and Gordian are
21
incorporated, provides that a member’s interest in an LLC is the member’s personal property.
22
Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 18-701. Members of MRP and Gordian therefore “own[] . . . a legal or
23
equitable interest, however small” in MRP or Gordian and thus possess a financial interest that
24
must be disclosed.
25
In addition, “the management of a limited liability company shall be vested in [all] its
26
members.” Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 18-402. Managers of LLCs are analogous to directors.
27
Members having “a relationship as a director, advisor” or who are otherwise an “active
28
1
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES;
CASE NO. 13-cv-3664-CRB
707860856.1
1
participant in the affairs of” MRP or Gordian have a financial interest that must be disclosed.
2
Other individuals or entities also have an “interest that could be substantially affected by
3
the outcome of the proceeding.” L.R. 3-16(b)(1). For instance, MRP has secured at least $46
4
million of financing to implement Defendants’ loan seizure program. Dkt. 34-7 at 34 of 57. The
5
investors providing this financing certainly have an interest that could be substantially affected
6
by the outcome of this case. Yet MRP and Gordian have not disclosed these investors.
7
MRP and Gordian have intentionally failed to disclose the identities of their members, the
8
loan seizure program’s investors, and anyone else who has a financial interest in MRP or
9
Gordian, or an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of this case. At a
10
minimum, their members have an ownership interest in the LLC and must be disclosed. L.R. 3-
11
16(b); 28 U.S.C. § 455(d)(4); Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 18-701. The Court should require that they
12
provide complete certifications.
13
14
Dated: October 31, 2013
MAYER BROWN LLP
DONALD M. FALK
BRONWYN F. POLLOCK
NOAH B. STEINSAPIR
MICHAEL D. SHAPIRO
15
16
17
18
By: /s/ Bronwyn F. Pollock
Bronwyn F. Pollock
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
(f/k/a The Bank of New York) and
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST
COMPANY, N.A.(f/k/a The Bank of New York
Trust Company, N.A.), as Trustees for the trusts
listed on Exhibit A of the Second Amended
Complaint
19
20
21
22
23
24
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: October 31, 2013
25
26
JONES DAY
BRIAN D. HERSHMAN (SBN 168175)
bhershman@jonesday.com
555 South Flower Street, 50th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2300
Tel: 213-489-3939
Fax: 213-243-2539
27
28
2
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES;
CASE NO. 13-cv-3664-CRB
707860856.1
JONES DAY
MATTHEW A. MARTEL
(pro hac vice)
mmartel@jonesday.com
JOSEPH B. SCONYERS
(pro hac vice)
jsconyers@jonesday.com
100 High Street, 21st Floor
Boston, MA 02110
Telephone: 617-960-3939
Facsimile: 617-449-6999
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
By: /s/ Brian D. Hershman
Brian D. Hershman
Attorneys for Plaintiff
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Trustee
8
9
10
Dated: October 31, 2013
11
12
13
14
15
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
KURT OSENBAUGH (SBN 106132)
kurt.osenbaugh@alston.com
WHITNEY CHELGREN (SBN 285362)
whitney.chelgren@alston.com
333 South Hope Street, Sixteenth Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone:
213-576-1000
Facsimile:
213-576-1100
By: /s/ Kurt Osenbaugh
Kurt Osenbaugh
Attorneys for Plaintiff
WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY and
WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Trustees
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES;
CASE NO. 13-cv-3664-CRB
707860856.1
1
2
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
I, Bronwyn F. Pollock, attest that the concurrence in the filing of this Plaintiffs’ response
3
to Certification of Interested Entities or Persons by Defendants Mortgage Resolution Partners
4
L.L.C. and Gordian Sword LLC (Dkt. 44) has been obtained from Brian D. Hershman and Kurt
5
Osenbaugh.
6
7
By: /s/ Bronwyn F. Pollock_____________
Bronwyn F. Pollock
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
(f/k/a The Bank of New York) and THE BANK
OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST
COMPANY, N.A. (f/k/a The Bank of New York
Trust Company, N.A.), as Trustees for the Trusts
listed in Exhibit A to the Second Amended
Complaint
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES;
CASE NO. 13-cv-3664-CRB
707860856.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?