Bank of New York Mellon v. City of Richmond, California et al

Filing 47

RESPONSE to re 44 Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons by Defendants Mortgage Resolution Partners L.L.C. and Gordian Sword LLC by Bank of New York Mellon, Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.. (Pollock, Bronwyn) (Filed on 10/31/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 MAYER BROWN LLP DONALD M. FALK (SBN 150256) dfalk@mayerbrown.com Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 Tel: 650-331-2000 Fax: 650-331-2060 BRONWYN F. POLLOCK (SBN 210912) bpollock@mayerbrown.com NOAH B. STEINSAPIR (SBN 252715) nsteinsapir@mayerbrown.com MICHAEL D. SHAPIRO (SBN 271912) mshapiro@mayerbrown.com 350 S. Grand Ave., 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503 Tel: 213-229-9500 Fax: 213-625-0248 Attorneys for Plaintiffs THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (f/k/a The Bank of New York) and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A. (f/k/a The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.) as Trustees for the Trusts listed on Exhibit A to the Second Amended Complaint [Additional counsel listed on signature page.] 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (f/k/a The Bank of New York) et al. 19 20 Plaintiffs, v. 21 22 23 24 CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, a municipality; RICHMOND CITY COUNCIL; MORTGAGE RESOLUTION PARTNERS L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company; and GORDIAN SWORD LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; 25 Case No. 3:13-cv-3664-CRB PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS BY DEFENDANTS MORTGAGE RESOLUTION PARTNERS L.L.C. AND GORDIAN SWORD LLC (DKT. 44) Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer Complaint filed: August 7, 2013 Defendants. 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES; CASE NO. 13-cv-3664-CRB 707860856.1 1 Plaintiffs The Bank of New York Mellon (f/k/a The Bank of New York), as trustee, The 2 Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (f/k/a The Bank of New York Trust Company, 3 N.A.), as trustee, U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, Wilmington Trust Company, as 4 trustee, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), 5 respond to the Certification of Interested Entities or Persons submitted by Defendants Mortgage 6 Resolution Partners L.L.C. (“MRP”) and Gordian Sword LLC (“Gordian”) (Dkt. 44). 7 MRP and Gordian disclose that the two LLCs have about 60 members but intentionally 8 withhold the identities of those members, and fail to disclose other individuals or entities that 9 have a financial interest in MRP or Gordian, or an interest in the outcome of the case. Local 10 Rule 3-16 requires MRP and Gordian to disclose any persons or entities that have “a financial 11 interest (of any kind) in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding” or “any 12 kind of interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding.” L.R. 3- 13 16(b)(1). “Financial interest” means “ownership of a legal or equitable interest, however small,” 14 or “a relationship as director, advisor, or other active participant in the affairs of a party.” 28 15 U.S.C. 455(d)(4); L.R. 3-16(b)(2). Defendants suggest that because they could not locate case 16 law specific to LLCs that they somehow are exempt from full disclosure. But that turns the rule 17 on its head—the rule requires broad disclosure unless exempted (e.g., expressly exempted from 18 the definition of “financial interest” is “[o]wnership in a mutual or common investment fund that 19 holds securities . . . unless the judge participates in the management of the fund”). 28 U.S.C. 20 § 455(d)(4)(i); L.R. 3-16(b)(2). Further, Delaware law, under which MRP and Gordian are 21 incorporated, provides that a member’s interest in an LLC is the member’s personal property. 22 Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 18-701. Members of MRP and Gordian therefore “own[] . . . a legal or 23 equitable interest, however small” in MRP or Gordian and thus possess a financial interest that 24 must be disclosed. 25 In addition, “the management of a limited liability company shall be vested in [all] its 26 members.” Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 18-402. Managers of LLCs are analogous to directors. 27 Members having “a relationship as a director, advisor” or who are otherwise an “active 28 1 PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES; CASE NO. 13-cv-3664-CRB 707860856.1 1 participant in the affairs of” MRP or Gordian have a financial interest that must be disclosed. 2 Other individuals or entities also have an “interest that could be substantially affected by 3 the outcome of the proceeding.” L.R. 3-16(b)(1). For instance, MRP has secured at least $46 4 million of financing to implement Defendants’ loan seizure program. Dkt. 34-7 at 34 of 57. The 5 investors providing this financing certainly have an interest that could be substantially affected 6 by the outcome of this case. Yet MRP and Gordian have not disclosed these investors. 7 MRP and Gordian have intentionally failed to disclose the identities of their members, the 8 loan seizure program’s investors, and anyone else who has a financial interest in MRP or 9 Gordian, or an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of this case. At a 10 minimum, their members have an ownership interest in the LLC and must be disclosed. L.R. 3- 11 16(b); 28 U.S.C. § 455(d)(4); Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 18-701. The Court should require that they 12 provide complete certifications. 13 14 Dated: October 31, 2013 MAYER BROWN LLP DONALD M. FALK BRONWYN F. POLLOCK NOAH B. STEINSAPIR MICHAEL D. SHAPIRO 15 16 17 18 By: /s/ Bronwyn F. Pollock Bronwyn F. Pollock Attorneys for Plaintiffs THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (f/k/a The Bank of New York) and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.(f/k/a The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.), as Trustees for the trusts listed on Exhibit A of the Second Amended Complaint 19 20 21 22 23 24 Respectfully submitted, Dated: October 31, 2013 25 26 JONES DAY BRIAN D. HERSHMAN (SBN 168175) bhershman@jonesday.com 555 South Flower Street, 50th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2300 Tel: 213-489-3939 Fax: 213-243-2539 27 28 2 PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES; CASE NO. 13-cv-3664-CRB 707860856.1 JONES DAY MATTHEW A. MARTEL (pro hac vice) mmartel@jonesday.com JOSEPH B. SCONYERS (pro hac vice) jsconyers@jonesday.com 100 High Street, 21st Floor Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: 617-960-3939 Facsimile: 617-449-6999 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 By: /s/ Brian D. Hershman Brian D. Hershman Attorneys for Plaintiff U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee 8 9 10 Dated: October 31, 2013 11 12 13 14 15 ALSTON & BIRD LLP KURT OSENBAUGH (SBN 106132) kurt.osenbaugh@alston.com WHITNEY CHELGREN (SBN 285362) whitney.chelgren@alston.com 333 South Hope Street, Sixteenth Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: 213-576-1000 Facsimile: 213-576-1100 By: /s/ Kurt Osenbaugh Kurt Osenbaugh Attorneys for Plaintiff WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustees 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES; CASE NO. 13-cv-3664-CRB 707860856.1 1 2 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I, Bronwyn F. Pollock, attest that the concurrence in the filing of this Plaintiffs’ response 3 to Certification of Interested Entities or Persons by Defendants Mortgage Resolution Partners 4 L.L.C. and Gordian Sword LLC (Dkt. 44) has been obtained from Brian D. Hershman and Kurt 5 Osenbaugh. 6 7 By: /s/ Bronwyn F. Pollock_____________ Bronwyn F. Pollock Attorneys for Plaintiffs THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (f/k/a The Bank of New York) and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A. (f/k/a The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.), as Trustees for the Trusts listed in Exhibit A to the Second Amended Complaint 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES; CASE NO. 13-cv-3664-CRB 707860856.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?