Bank of New York Mellon v. City of Richmond, California et al
Filing
62
Proposed Order re 59 Opposition/Response to Motion, Denying Rule 11 Sanctions by Bank of New York Mellon, Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association, Wilmington Trust Company, Wilmington Trust, National Association. (Hershman, Brian) (Filed on 11/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
(f/k/a The Bank of New York), et al.
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, a
municipality, et al.
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RULE
11 SANCTIONS
Date:
Time:
Judge:
15
16
17
18
Case No. 13-cv-3664-CRB
January 24, 2014
10:00 a.m.
Hon. Charles R. Breyer
Courtroom 6, 17th Floor
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions (D.E. #55). Upon
19
consideration of the papers and argument by counsel, the Court finds that Plaintiffs did not violate
20
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion for
21
Rule 11 Sanctions.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January ____, 2014
_______________________________
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?