Adams et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.

Filing 19

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-14) by The United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, MDL No. 2434. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2013)

Download PDF
Case MDL No. 2434 Document 292 Filed 08/29/13 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MUL TIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: MIRENA IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2434 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -14) On April 8, 2013, the Panel transferred 7 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2013). Since that time, 128 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Southern District ofNew York. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Cathy Seibel. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District ofNew York and assigned to Judge Seibel. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 ofthe Rules ofProcedure ofthe United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Southern District of New York for the reasons stated in the order of April 8, 2013, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Cathy Seibel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District ofNew York. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: #k&?A Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. Jeffery N. Luthi Clerk of the Panel Aug 29,2013 CLERK'S OFFICE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION A CERTIFIED COPY RUBY J. K.RAJICK, CLERK svJlkik~ · Depu lerk Case MDL No. 2434 Document 292 Filed 08/29/13 Page 2 of 2 IN RE: MIRENA IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2434 SCHEDULE CT0-14- TAG-ALONG ACTIONS C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 2 13-01665 Fadel v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 13-03700 CAN 4 13-03701 Dias v. Bayer Hea1thCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Adams et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. GEORGIA NORTHERN GAN GAN GAN GAN GAN GAN GAN GAN GAN GAN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13-02513 13-02514 13-02596 13-02599 13-02601 13-02602 13-02621 13-02639 13-02640 13-02656 Londono v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Redd v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Nye v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Hall v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Davis v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Shelton v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Garcia v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Martinez v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Sadira v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dangar et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ILLINOIS CENTRAL ILC 3 13-03230 Stephens v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc 13-02141 Yasin et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. MINNESOTA MN 0

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?