Adams et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
Filing
19
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-14) by The United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, MDL No. 2434. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2013)
Case MDL No. 2434 Document 292 Filed 08/29/13 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MUL TIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: MIRENA IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
MDL No. 2434
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -14)
On April 8, 2013, the Panel transferred 7 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2013). Since that time, 128 additional action(s) have been
transferred to the Southern District ofNew York. With the consent of that court, all such actions
have been assigned to the Honorable Cathy Seibel.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District ofNew York and assigned to
Judge Seibel.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 ofthe Rules ofProcedure ofthe United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
Southern District of New York for the reasons stated in the order of April 8, 2013, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Cathy Seibel.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Southern District ofNew York. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall
be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
FOR THE PANEL:
#k&?A
Inasmuch as no objection is
pending at this time, the
stay is lifted.
Jeffery N. Luthi
Clerk of the Panel
Aug 29,2013
CLERK'S OFFICE
UNITED STATES
JUDICIAL PANEL ON
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
A CERTIFIED COPY
RUBY J. K.RAJICK, CLERK
svJlkik~
·
Depu
lerk
Case MDL No. 2434 Document 292 Filed 08/29/13 Page 2 of 2
IN RE: MIRENA IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
MDL No. 2434
SCHEDULE CT0-14- TAG-ALONG ACTIONS
C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
CALIFORNIA EASTERN
CAE
2
13-01665
Fadel v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN
3
13-03700
CAN
4
13-03701
Dias v. Bayer Hea1thCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Adams et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,
et al.
GEORGIA NORTHERN
GAN
GAN
GAN
GAN
GAN
GAN
GAN
GAN
GAN
GAN
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
13-02513
13-02514
13-02596
13-02599
13-02601
13-02602
13-02621
13-02639
13-02640
13-02656
Londono v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Redd v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Nye v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Hall v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc,
Davis v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Shelton v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Garcia v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Martinez v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Sadira v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Dangar et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
ILLINOIS CENTRAL
ILC
3
13-03230
Stephens v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc
13-02141
Yasin et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
MINNESOTA
MN
0
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?