Avery v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al
Filing
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS re 15 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Warren Avery. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/22/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Marc I. Gross
Jeremy A. Lieberman
POMERANTZ GROSSMAN HUFFORD
DAHLSTROM & GROSS LLP
600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Telephone: (212) 661-1100
Facsimile: (212) 661-8665
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WARREN AVERY, Individually and on Behalf of
All Others Similarly Situated,
10
11
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 13-cv-03733-WHO
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS
JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., KEVIN R. JOHNSON,
PRADEEP S. SINDHU, ROBYN M. DENHOLM and
GENE ZAMISKA
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The parties hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on August 12, 2013, Plaintiff commenced this putative class action for alleged
violation of the federal securities laws, (“Complaint”), Dkt. No. 1;
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2013, Plaintiff filed an unopposed motion for appointment as lead
plaintiffs pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Dkt. No. 7;
WHEREAS, on October 29, 2013, the parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order setting the
schedule for filing a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint and setting a briefing schedule for
the Motion to Dismiss(“Stipulation”), Dkt. No. 11;
WHEREAS, on October 30, 2013, the Court ordered, pursuant to the Stipulation, that
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS
1
Plaintiffs shall have forty-five (45) days to file their Amended Complaint from the date the Court orders
2
appointment of Lead Plaintiff and that briefing on the motion to dismiss shall follow, giving each party
3
45 days to file their opening motion and opposition, respectively, and giving defendants 30 days to file
4
their reply brief. Dkt. No. 13. The Order specifically provides that “The dates December 21, 2013 to
5
6
7
January 1, 2014, inclusive, shall not be counted when calculating” the time-frames for the Amended
Complaint and Motion to Dismiss briefing. Id., ¶ 5. The Order also provides that after the Court
8
appoints Lead Plaintiff, that the parties meet and confer regarding the specific deadline dates (“given
9
the foregoing provision to accommodate the holidays”) and to select a mutually agreeable hearing date,
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Dkt. No. 13, ¶ 6.
WHEREAS, on November 12, 2013, the Court appointed Warren Avery as Lead Plaintiff and
approved the selection of Pomerantz Grossman Hufford Dahlstrom & Gross LLP as lead counsel and
the law firm of Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP as liaison counsel, Dkt. No. 14;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Stipulation, Plaintiffs Consolidated Amended Complaint would be
due on January 8, 2014.
WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred regarding the deadlines and have agreed to
revise the specific deadline dates as follows:
Amended complaint due: January 17, 2014;
21
Motion(s) to dismiss due: March 5, 2014;
22
Opposition brief(s) due: April 21, 2014;
23
24
25
Reply brief(s) due: May 23, 2014;
Hearing on Motion to Dismiss: June 25, 2014.
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate that they approve as to form the
proposed order attached hereto.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
5
6
Dated: November 19, 2013
7
POMERANTZ GROSSMAN HUFFORD
DAHLSTROM & GROSS LLP
/s/ Leigh Handelman Smollar
Patrick V. Dahlstrom
Leigh Handelman Smollar
Louis C. Ludwig
Ten South LaSalle Street, Suite 3505
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Tel: (312) 377-1181
Fax: (312) 377-1184
8
9
10
11
12
Marc I. Gross
Jeremy A. Lieberman
Lesley F. Portnoy
600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Telephone: (212) 661-1100
Facsimile: (212) 661-8665
Email: jalieberman@pomlaw.com
13
14
15
16
17
18
Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Warren Avery
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
I, Leigh Handelman Smollar, an the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this
Stipulation and [Proposed Order] Extending Time to File Consolidated Amended Complaint and
Setting Briefing Schedule on Motion to Dismiss. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest
that Joni Ostler, Counsel for Defendants, has concurred in this filing
Dated: November 19, 2013
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
By: /s/ Joni Ostler
Counsel for Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS
1
ORDER
2
3
4
5
6
7
Pursuant to Stipulation, it is SO ORDERED:
The Consolidated Amended complaint shall be due on January 17, 2014;
The Motion(s) to dismiss shall be due on March 5, 2014;
Opposition brief(s) shall be due on April 21, 2014;
8
Reply brief(s) shall be due on May 23, 2014;
9
Hearing Date: June 25, 2014
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Dated: _________________, 2013
November 22
_________________________________
HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Northern District of California
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that on the of November 19, 2013, I caused to be served electronically the foregoing
3
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to File Consolidated Amended Complaint and
4
Setting Briefing Schedule on Motion to Dismiss with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system,
5
which will send notification of such filing to all counsel of record.
6
7
/s/ Leigh Handelman Smollar
Leigh Handelman Smollar
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?