Avery v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS re 15 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Warren Avery. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/22/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Marc I. Gross Jeremy A. Lieberman POMERANTZ GROSSMAN HUFFORD DAHLSTROM & GROSS LLP 600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor New York, New York 10016 Telephone: (212) 661-1100 Facsimile: (212) 661-8665 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WARREN AVERY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 10 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. No. 13-cv-03733-WHO STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., KEVIN R. JOHNSON, PRADEEP S. SINDHU, ROBYN M. DENHOLM and GENE ZAMISKA Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on August 12, 2013, Plaintiff commenced this putative class action for alleged violation of the federal securities laws, (“Complaint”), Dkt. No. 1; WHEREAS, on October 11, 2013, Plaintiff filed an unopposed motion for appointment as lead plaintiffs pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Dkt. No. 7; WHEREAS, on October 29, 2013, the parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order setting the schedule for filing a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint and setting a briefing schedule for the Motion to Dismiss(“Stipulation”), Dkt. No. 11; WHEREAS, on October 30, 2013, the Court ordered, pursuant to the Stipulation, that STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS 1 Plaintiffs shall have forty-five (45) days to file their Amended Complaint from the date the Court orders 2 appointment of Lead Plaintiff and that briefing on the motion to dismiss shall follow, giving each party 3 45 days to file their opening motion and opposition, respectively, and giving defendants 30 days to file 4 their reply brief. Dkt. No. 13. The Order specifically provides that “The dates December 21, 2013 to 5 6 7 January 1, 2014, inclusive, shall not be counted when calculating” the time-frames for the Amended Complaint and Motion to Dismiss briefing. Id., ¶ 5. The Order also provides that after the Court 8 appoints Lead Plaintiff, that the parties meet and confer regarding the specific deadline dates (“given 9 the foregoing provision to accommodate the holidays”) and to select a mutually agreeable hearing date, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Dkt. No. 13, ¶ 6. WHEREAS, on November 12, 2013, the Court appointed Warren Avery as Lead Plaintiff and approved the selection of Pomerantz Grossman Hufford Dahlstrom & Gross LLP as lead counsel and the law firm of Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP as liaison counsel, Dkt. No. 14; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Stipulation, Plaintiffs Consolidated Amended Complaint would be due on January 8, 2014. WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred regarding the deadlines and have agreed to revise the specific deadline dates as follows: Amended complaint due: January 17, 2014; 21 Motion(s) to dismiss due: March 5, 2014; 22 Opposition brief(s) due: April 21, 2014; 23 24 25 Reply brief(s) due: May 23, 2014; Hearing on Motion to Dismiss: June 25, 2014. 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS 1 2 3 NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate that they approve as to form the proposed order attached hereto. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 4 5 6 Dated: November 19, 2013 7 POMERANTZ GROSSMAN HUFFORD DAHLSTROM & GROSS LLP /s/ Leigh Handelman Smollar Patrick V. Dahlstrom Leigh Handelman Smollar Louis C. Ludwig Ten South LaSalle Street, Suite 3505 Chicago, Illinois 60603 Tel: (312) 377-1181 Fax: (312) 377-1184 8 9 10 11 12 Marc I. Gross Jeremy A. Lieberman Lesley F. Portnoy 600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor New York, New York 10016 Telephone: (212) 661-1100 Facsimile: (212) 661-8665 Email: jalieberman@pomlaw.com 13 14 15 16 17 18 Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Warren Avery 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 I, Leigh Handelman Smollar, an the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed Order] Extending Time to File Consolidated Amended Complaint and Setting Briefing Schedule on Motion to Dismiss. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that Joni Ostler, Counsel for Defendants, has concurred in this filing Dated: November 19, 2013 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI By: /s/ Joni Ostler Counsel for Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS 1 ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 7 Pursuant to Stipulation, it is SO ORDERED: The Consolidated Amended complaint shall be due on January 17, 2014; The Motion(s) to dismiss shall be due on March 5, 2014; Opposition brief(s) shall be due on April 21, 2014; 8 Reply brief(s) shall be due on May 23, 2014; 9 Hearing Date: June 25, 2014 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Dated: _________________, 2013 November 22 _________________________________ HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Northern District of California 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on the of November 19, 2013, I caused to be served electronically the foregoing 3 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to File Consolidated Amended Complaint and 4 Setting Briefing Schedule on Motion to Dismiss with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, 5 which will send notification of such filing to all counsel of record. 6 7 /s/ Leigh Handelman Smollar Leigh Handelman Smollar 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?