Livingston v. Art.com, Inc. et al
Filing
99
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting 98 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2015) Modified on 1/15/2015 (ahm, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
PETE LIVINGSTON,
Case No. 13-cv-03748-JSC
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
11
ART.COM, INC., et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL
Re: Dkt. No. 98
12
13
14
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Pete Livingston’s administrative motion to file under
15
seal the Royalty Report that the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit in support of its motion for
16
default judgment. (Dkt. No. 98.) Plaintiff contends that sealing is appropriate because the
17
Royalty Report contains the confidential sales records of Culturenik Publishing, Inc.—a defendant
18
in the related action that the Court severed from this case. (Id. at 2; see also Dkt. No. 35.) In
19
support of its motion to seal, Plaintiff highlights the declaration of Patrick Smith, which was
20
submitted in the connection with summary judgment briefing in the related action. (Id.; see also
21
Dkt. Nos. 56-2, 56-1 ¶ 3.) According to Smith, “[t]he royalty reports . . . are confidential to
22
Culturenik, as they reveal sensitive information concerning the royalty rates paid by Culturenik for
23
several of its products.” (Dkt. No. 56-1 ¶ 3.) In addition, Plaintiff notes that the Court previously
24
allowed Plaintiff to file the Royalty Report under seal in the related litigation, finding a
25
compelling reason to seal the document. (Id.; see Dkt. No. 57-4; Dkt. No. 64.) So it is here.
26
Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion is GRANTED. Exhibit A (Dkt. No.
27
98-2) to Plaintiff’s Supplemental Brief and Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Royalty
28
Report of Pete Livingston’s Declaration in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment
1
2
3
4
5
shall be filed under seal consistent with this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 15, 2015
______________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?