Melgar v. CSK Auto, Inc.
Filing
148
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC. Case Management Statement due by 6/14/2018. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/21/2018 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/24/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
MICHAEL MALK (Bar No. 222366)
mm@malklawfirm.com
MICHAEL MALK, ESQ., APC
1180 South Beverly Drive, Suite 302
Los Angeles, CA 90035
Telephone:
310.203.0016
Facsimile:
310.499.5210
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
OSMIN MELGAR and KARO
KHATCHADOORIAN
JAMES M. PETERSON (Bar No. 137837)
peterson@higgslaw.com
EDWIN M. BONISKE (Bar No. 265701)
boniske@higgslaw.com
HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK LLP
401 West “A” Street, Suite 2600
San Diego, CA 92101-7913
Telephone:
619.236.1551
Facsimile:
619.696.1410
Attorneys for Defendant
CSK AUTO, INC. n/k/a O’Reilly Auto
Enterprises, LLC
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
OSMIN MELGAR, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
18
19
20
21
22
Plaintiff,
v.
CSK AUTO, INC., an Arizona
Corporation, and DOES 1-100,
Defendants.
Case No. 3:13-CV-03769 (EMC)
STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO
CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
CMC Date:
CMC Time:
JUDGE:
DEPT:
April 26, 2018
10:30 am
Hon. Edward M. Chen
5
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:13-CV-03769 (EMC)
STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
This Stipulation and Joint Motion is entered into by and between Plaintiffs Osmin Melgar
2
and Karo Khatchadoorian (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant CSK Auto, Inc., n/k/a O’Reilly Auto
3
Enterprises, LLC, through their undersigned counsel of record. The Parties hereby stipulate and
4
agree as follows:
5
1.
The Parties have reached an agreement to settle this case, have finalized the formal
6
settlement agreement and related class notice documents, and are in the process of circulating the
7
agreement to the Parties for signature;
8
9
10
2.
Plaintiffs’ counsel has drafted the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class
Action Settlement, and anticipates filing the motion by Friday, April 27, 2018.
3.
Based on the foregoing, the Parties respectfully request that the Court continue the
11
Case Management Conference currently scheduled for April 26, 2018, and request that the Court
12
re-set the Case Management Conference to coincide with the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for
13
preliminary approval.
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15
Respectfully Submitted,
16
DATED: April 23, 2018
MICHAEL MALK, ESQ., APC
17
By: /s/ Michael Malk
MICHAEL MALK.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
OSMIN MELGAR and KARO
KHATCHADOORIAN
18
19
20
21
DATED: April 23, 2018
HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK, LLP
22
23
24
25
By: /s/ Edwin M. Boniske
JAMES M. PETERSON, ESQ.
EDWIN BONISKE, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendant
CSK AUTO, INC. n/k/a O’REILLY AUTO
ENTERPRISES, LLC
26
27
28
2
Case No. 3:13-CV-03769 (EMC)
STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
6/21/18 at 1:30 p.m.
that the Case Management Conference be continued until _____________________________.
4
12
S
dward
Judge E
ER
n
M. Che
H
11
RT
10
NO
9
DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO
R NIA
8
United States District Judge
FO
7
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA Edward M. Chen
Hon.
RT
U
O
6
4/24/18
DATED: ____________________
UNIT
ED
5
LI
3
In accordance with the above stipulation, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered
A
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 3:13-CV-03769 (EMC)
STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?