Melgar v. CSK Auto, Inc.

Filing 148

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC. Case Management Statement due by 6/14/2018. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/21/2018 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/24/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 MICHAEL MALK (Bar No. 222366) mm@malklawfirm.com MICHAEL MALK, ESQ., APC 1180 South Beverly Drive, Suite 302 Los Angeles, CA 90035 Telephone: 310.203.0016 Facsimile: 310.499.5210 Attorneys for Plaintiffs OSMIN MELGAR and KARO KHATCHADOORIAN JAMES M. PETERSON (Bar No. 137837) peterson@higgslaw.com EDWIN M. BONISKE (Bar No. 265701) boniske@higgslaw.com HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK LLP 401 West “A” Street, Suite 2600 San Diego, CA 92101-7913 Telephone: 619.236.1551 Facsimile: 619.696.1410 Attorneys for Defendant CSK AUTO, INC. n/k/a O’Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 OSMIN MELGAR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, v. CSK AUTO, INC., an Arizona Corporation, and DOES 1-100, Defendants. Case No. 3:13-CV-03769 (EMC) STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER CMC Date: CMC Time: JUDGE: DEPT: April 26, 2018 10:30 am Hon. Edward M. Chen 5 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:13-CV-03769 (EMC) STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 This Stipulation and Joint Motion is entered into by and between Plaintiffs Osmin Melgar 2 and Karo Khatchadoorian (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant CSK Auto, Inc., n/k/a O’Reilly Auto 3 Enterprises, LLC, through their undersigned counsel of record. The Parties hereby stipulate and 4 agree as follows: 5 1. The Parties have reached an agreement to settle this case, have finalized the formal 6 settlement agreement and related class notice documents, and are in the process of circulating the 7 agreement to the Parties for signature; 8 9 10 2. Plaintiffs’ counsel has drafted the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, and anticipates filing the motion by Friday, April 27, 2018. 3. Based on the foregoing, the Parties respectfully request that the Court continue the 11 Case Management Conference currently scheduled for April 26, 2018, and request that the Court 12 re-set the Case Management Conference to coincide with the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for 13 preliminary approval. 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 Respectfully Submitted, 16 DATED: April 23, 2018 MICHAEL MALK, ESQ., APC 17 By: /s/ Michael Malk MICHAEL MALK. Attorneys for Plaintiffs OSMIN MELGAR and KARO KHATCHADOORIAN 18 19 20 21 DATED: April 23, 2018 HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK, LLP 22 23 24 25 By: /s/ Edwin M. Boniske JAMES M. PETERSON, ESQ. EDWIN BONISKE, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant CSK AUTO, INC. n/k/a O’REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES, LLC 26 27 28 2 Case No. 3:13-CV-03769 (EMC) STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 6/21/18 at 1:30 p.m. that the Case Management Conference be continued until _____________________________. 4 12 S dward Judge E ER n M. Che H 11 RT 10 NO 9 DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO R NIA 8 United States District Judge FO 7 S DISTRICT TE C TA Edward M. Chen Hon. RT U O 6 4/24/18 DATED: ____________________ UNIT ED 5 LI 3 In accordance with the above stipulation, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered A 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER N D IS T IC T R OF C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 3:13-CV-03769 (EMC) STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?