UBS Financial Services Inc. v. Berger
Filing
26
ORDER FOR UPDATE REGARDING SERVICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/31/2014. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
Northern District of California
10
San Francisco Division
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC., a
Delaware corporation,
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
Petitioner,
13
No. C 13-03770 LB
ORDER FOR UPDATE REGARDING
SERVICE
v.
14
HENRIQUE BERGER, an individual,
15
Respondent.
_____________________________________/
16
17
On January 17, 2014, the court allowed service by email of the pending petition to enforce the
18
arbitration award. See ECF No. 17. On February 21, 2014, Petitioner filed a proof of service by
19
email. On March 12, 2014, Petitioner updated the court that they did not receive any indication that
20
the email transmission was unsuccessful. See ECF No. 25 at 2. The due date for the opposition was
21
March 25, 2014. See Docket text for ECF No. 23. No opposition has been filed. The court directs
22
Petitioner to file an update by April 1, 2014, which is the due date for its reply, about whether it has
23
received any response. Petitioner also is directed to serve a copy of this order by email to Mr.
24
Berger at the previously-provided email of hberger57@gmail.com. Mr. Berger is warned that
25
failure to respond to the petition or to this order may be construed as a non-opposition to the
26
petition.
27
Counsel may participate by telephone at the April 17, 2014 hearing.
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
C 13-03770
ORDER
1
Dated: March 31, 2014
2
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C 13-03770
ORDER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?