Maurer et al v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company et al

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re: Dismissal filed by Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 09/30/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DURIE TANGRI LLP DARALYN J. DURIE (SBN 169825) ddurie@durietangri.com MICHAEL H. PAGE (SBN 154913) mpage@durietangri.com 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-362-6666 Facsimile: 415-236-6300 Attorneys for Defendant PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 SANDRA MAURER, SANDRA MAURER dba EMF Safety Network, JOSHUA HART, JOSHUA HART dba STOP SMART METERS!, GARRIL PAGE, GARRIL PAGE dba OBILITY, VALERI HOOD, and MARY BETH BRANGAN, 17 18 19 STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL Ctrm: 5, 17th Floor Judge: Honorable Edward M. Chen Plaintiffs, 15 16 Case No. 3:13-cv-03773-EMC v. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, WILLIAM DEVEREAUX, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL / CASE NO. 3:13-CV-03773-EMC 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS, BY AND 2 THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEY, LAWRENCE BRAGMAN, DEFENDANT PACIFIC GAS AND 3 ELECTRIC COMPANY BY AND THROUGH ITS ATTORNEY, MICHAEL H. PAGE AND 4 DEFENDANT WILLIAM DEVEREAUX BY AND THROUGH HIS ATTORNEY, SETH HILTON 5 THAT: 6 7 8 9 1. All claims by all Plaintiffs in the above captioned matter are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants, including “Doe” defendants; and 2. Each party herein shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. Dated: September 26, 2013 DURIE TANGRI LLP 10 By: 11 12 /s/ Michael H. Page MICHAEL H. PAGE Attorney for Defendant PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY 13 14 15 Dated: September 26, 2013 By: 16 17 /s/ Lawrence Bragman LAWRENCE BRAGMAN Attorney for Plaintiffs 18 19 Dated: September 26, 2013 STOEL RIVES LLP 20 By: 21 /s/ Seth D. Hilton SETH D. HILTON 22 Attorney for Defendant WILLIAM DEVEREAUX 23 24 25 FILER’S ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Michael H. Page, attest that concurrence 26 in the filing of this document has been obtained. 27 Dated: September 26, 2013 /s/ Michael H. Page MICHAEL H. PAGE 28 1 STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL / CASE NO. 3:13-CV-03773-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. All deadlines and hearings are vacated. 3 S Dated: ______________ S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 7 DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO NO 8 RT 10 ER 11 n M. Che H 9 dward Judge E R NIA 6 FO UNIT ED HON. EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 LI 4 9/30/13 A 2 N F D IS T IC T O R 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL / CASE NO. 3:13-CV-03773-EMC C 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I certify that all counsel of record is being served on September 26, 2013 with a copy of this 3 document via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 4 5 /s/ Michael H. Page MICHAEL H. PAGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL / CASE NO. 3:13-CV-03773-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?