Easter v. Spearmen
Filing
4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/30/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANNY CLIFFORD EASTER,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Petitioner,
Case No. 13-3784 WHO (PR)
12
v.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
13
14
15
MARION E. SPEARMEN,
Respondent.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Petitioner Danny Easter has failed to comply with the Court’s order to (1) file a
complete application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), or (2) pay the full filing fee of
$5.00. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to respond to
the Court’s order, and for failure to prosecute, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Because this
dismissal is without prejudice, Easter may move to reopen the action. Any such motion
must contain (1) a complete IFP application, or (2) full payment for the filing fee of $5.00.
The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of respondent, and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 30, 2013
_________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DANIEL EASTER,
Case Number: CV13-03784 WHO
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
MARION E SPEARMAN et al,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on September 30, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy of the attached, by placing said
copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail.
Danny Clifford Easter AK-1133
CTF-North State Prison
P.O. Box 705
Soledad, CA 93960-0705
Dated: September 30, 2013
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jean Davis, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?