Vazquez v. Select Portfolio Servicing, et al.

Filing 56

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Show Cause Response due by 3/14/2014. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 21, 2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

R. IVANNE VAZQUEZ,

Case No. 13-cv-03789-JST

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

9
10

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

On January 13, 2014, this Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint, ECF No. 1, with leave to

13

amend. Order, ECF No. 49. The Court Ordered Plaintiff to “either (1) file an amended complaint

14

consistent with the terms of this Order or (2) file a notice of submission to the Court’s Order,

15

which will result in a final dismissal with prejudice,” by no later than February 12, 2014. Order at

16

6. The Court noted that “[f]ailure to comply with this paragraph will constitute a violation of the

17

Court’s Order, which may result in dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).”

18

Id.
Plaintiff has not filed either an amended complaint or a notice of submission to the Court’s

19
20

Order of dismissal, and the deadline to do so has passed.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not

21
22

dismiss this action, or impose other appropriate sanctions, for failure to comply with a Court

23

Order, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Yourish v. California Amplifier,

24

191 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 1999).
Plaintiff shall respond to this Order in writing by March 14, 2014, by either (1) filing an

25
26

amended complaint or (2) demonstrating good cause for Plaintiff’s failure to file an amended

27

///

28

///

1

complaint. Failure to respond to this Order shall constitute an additional ground for the imposition

2

of appropriate sanctions, including involuntary dismissal with prejudice.

3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 21, 2014
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2